nho*_*hoj 6 java multithreading priority-queue
下面的Java代码示例使用java DelayQueue来处理任务.但是,从另一个线程插入任务似乎会破坏(我的)预期行为.
抱歉代码示例如此之长,但总结如下:
我从代码示例中获得的输出是:
------initial tasks ---------------
task A due in 0ms
task B due in 9ms
task C due in 99ms
task D due in 999ms
task E due in 9999ms
task F due in 99999ms
------processing--------------------
time = 5 task A due in -1ms
time = 14 task B due in 0ms
time = 104 task C due in 0ms
time = 1004 task D due in 0ms
time = 3003 added task Z due in 0ms
------remaining after 15007ms -----------
task F due in 84996ms
task E due in -5003ms
task Z due in -12004ms
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我的问题是:为什么在15000ms之后,DelayQueue中还有剩余的任务(即GetDelay()返回-ve值)?
我检查过的一些事情:
我将最感兴趣的是学习如何解决这个问题.提前感谢您的协助.(以及帮助我约会的所有Stack Overflow答案:)
package test;
import java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.Delayed;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
public class Test10_DelayQueue {
private static final TimeUnit delayUnit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
private static final TimeUnit ripeUnit = TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS;
static long startTime;
static class Task implements Delayed {
public long ripe;
public String name;
public Task(String name, int delay) {
this.name = name;
ripe = System.nanoTime() + ripeUnit.convert(delay, delayUnit);
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (obj instanceof Task) {
return compareTo((Task) obj) == 0;
}
return false;
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
int hash = 7;
hash = 67 * hash + (int) (this.ripe ^ (this.ripe >>> 32));
hash = 67 * hash + (this.name != null ? this.name.hashCode() : 0);
return hash;
}
@Override
public int compareTo(Delayed delayed) {
if (delayed instanceof Task) {
Task that = (Task) delayed;
return (int) (this.ripe - that.ripe);
}
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public long getDelay(TimeUnit unit) {
return unit.convert(ripe - System.nanoTime(), ripeUnit);
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "task " + name + " due in " + String.valueOf(getDelay(delayUnit) + "ms");
}
}
static class TaskAdder implements Runnable {
DelayQueue dq;
int delay;
public TaskAdder(DelayQueue dq, int delay) {
this.dq = dq;
this.delay = delay;
}
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Thread.sleep(delay);
Task z = new Task("Z", 0);
dq.add(z);
Long elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime;
System.out.println("time = " + elapsed + "\tadded " + z);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
DelayQueue<Task> taskQ = new DelayQueue<Task>();
Thread thread = new Thread(new TaskAdder(taskQ, 3000));
thread.start();
taskQ.add(new Task("A", 0));
taskQ.add(new Task("B", 10));
taskQ.add(new Task("C", 100));
taskQ.add(new Task("D", 1000));
taskQ.add(new Task("E", 10000));
taskQ.add(new Task("F", 100000));
System.out.println("------initial tasks ---------------");
Task[] tasks = taskQ.toArray(new Task[0]);
for (int i = 0; i < tasks.length; i++) {
System.out.println(tasks[i]);
}
System.out.println("------processing--------------------");
try {
Long elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime;
while (elapsed < 15000) {
Task task = taskQ.poll(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime;
if (task != null) {
System.out.println("time = " + elapsed + "\t" + task);
}
}
System.out.println("------remaining after " + elapsed + "ms -----------");
tasks = taskQ.toArray(new Task[0]);
for (int i = 0; i < tasks.length; i++) {
System.out.println(tasks[i]);
}
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因为你的comapareTo方法充满了缺陷。正确的实现如下。一旦你像下面这样改变,你的所有问题都会得到解决。compareTo如果或遵守compareTo合同,请始终尝试重用方法
return Long.valueOf(this.ripe).compareTo(that.ripe);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
原因是数值溢出.
你的compareTo()方法是以long纳秒为单位施加差异int,但超过2.2秒的纳秒数不能保持在一个int并且你会得到一个溢出 - 给出或多或少的随机结果,所以队列中的顺序可能落后于一个如果将来超过2.2秒,则会延迟到期.
poll()不会超出队列中的下一个项目,compareTo当项目放入队列时,该方法的顺序由方法定义.
此外,equals()应该同意hashCode(),以及compareTo().有关详细信息,请参阅javadochashCode().
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
3529 次 |
| 最近记录: |