Fro*_*art 5 c++ iterator wofstream
为什么C++中没有std::wostream_iterator?
这有什么好的理由吗?
#include <fstream>
#include <iterator>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
std::vector<std::wstring> myvec = { L"first", L"second" };
std::wofstream f("New.txt");
// std::copy(myvec.begin(), myvec.end(), std::wostream_iterator<std::wstring>(f)); // Error
// std::copy(myvec.begin(), myvec.end(), std::ostream_iterator<std::wstring>(f)); // Error
std::copy(myvec.begin(), myvec.end(), std::ostream_iterator<std::wstring, wchar_t>(f)); // Ok
std::copy(myvec.begin(), myvec.end(), std::ostream_iterator<std::wstring, wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t>>(f)); // Ok
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因为std::ostream_iterator不是typedef(并且std::wstringtypedef 带有std::basic_string= charT)wchar_t。
template <class T, class charT = char, class traits = char_traits<charT> >
class ostream_iterator:
public iterator<output_iterator_tag, void, void, void, void>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
第二次复制操作
std::copy(myvec.begin(), myvec.end(), std::ostream_iterator<std::wstring>(f));
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
是不正确的,因为
typedef basic_ostream<charT,traits> ostream_type;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以,在这种情况下ostream_type是basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >
ostream_iterator(ostream_type& s);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
构造函数只能接收这个类型,但是我们传递了basic_ofstream<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t> >,这是不正确的。