tsh*_*ang 4 c++ linux sleep timing gettimeofday
我想clock_gettime使用弃用的gettimeofday参考来检查可靠性,但有时会得到奇怪的结果:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <iostream>
void clock_gettime_test()
{
struct timespec tp;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, &tp);
long a = tp.tv_nsec;
usleep(250000);
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, &tp);
long b = tp.tv_nsec;
printf("clock_gettime (%ld - %ld): %lf msec\n", b, a, (b - a)/1000000.0);
}
void gettimeofday_test()
{
struct timeval tv;
gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
long a = tv.tv_usec;
usleep(250000);
gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
long b = tv.tv_usec;
printf("gettimeofday (%ld - %ld): %lf msec\n", b, a, (b - a)/1000.0);
}
int main()
{
clock_gettime_test();
gettimeofday_test();
return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
建立和运行,我有时会得到正确的结果:
$ g++ -Wall play.cpp -lrt && ./a.out
clock_gettime (392441961 - 142299879): 250.142082 msec
gettimeofday (592906 - 342644): 250.262000 msec
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但有时候,我没那么幸运:
clock_gettime (155321165 - 905000848): -749.679683 msec
gettimeofday (352232 - 101938): 250.294000 msec
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
甚至:
clock_gettime (947857371 - 697373625): 250.483746 msec
gettimeofday (225208 - 974908): -749.700000 msec
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我在i686和amd64上都试过这个,并得到类似的结果.我也尝试过nanosleep,同样悲伤的结果.
你只是比较tv_nsec会员struct timespec,你也应该比较tv_sec会员:
double msec = ((tpb.tv_sec - tpa.tv_sec) * 1000.0)
+ ((tpb.tv_nsec - tpa.tv_nsec) / 1000000.0);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
同样,您应该比较两者tv_sec和tv_usec成员struct timeval以获得经过的时间:
double msec = ((tvb.tv_sec - tva.tv_sec) * 1000.0)
+ ((tvb.tv_usec - tva.tv_usec) / 1000.0);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
2126 次 |
| 最近记录: |