slo*_*oth 62 .net c# performance types
两者之间是否有任何可测量的性能差异
((TypeA) obj).method1();
((TypeA) obj).method2();
((TypeA) obj).method3();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
和
var A = (TypeA) obj;
A.method1();
A.method2();
A.method3();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
什么时候使用?
我经常看到类似的东西
if (((TextBox)sender).Text.Contains('.') || ((TextBox)sender).Text.Contains(','))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
并想知道这是否是对性能的浪费.
Jon*_*eet 54
如果用很少的其他工作完成数十亿次,这可能是可测量的.我不知道CLR是否会有效地缓存转换工作的事实,因此它不需要再次执行 - 如果它现在不这样做,它可能会在以后的版本中这样做.它可能在64位JIT但不是32位版本中这样做,反之亦然 - 你明白了.我怀疑它会在普通代码中产生重大影响.
我个人更喜欢第二种形式的可读性,而且到目前为止更为重要.
Rob*_*les 45
@dkson:我测试了两种方法.这是我在计算机上找到的内容:
他们对相同的性能.事实上,我发现第二种方法稍慢.原因(我相信)是额外变量和初始演员的成本.当然,如果你使用足够的演员阵容,你可能会获得性能成本.只有在节省了20-30次演员之后,你才能在表演方面实现收支平衡.
以下是最近两次测试运行的结果:
TestMuliCast\_3x: 00:00:00.5970000
TestSingleCast\_3x: 00:00:00.6020000
TestMuliCast\_30x: 00:00:06.0930000
TestSingleCast\_30x: 00:00:06.0480000
TestMuliCast\_3x: 00:00:00.6120000
TestSingleCast\_3x: 00:00:00.6250000
TestMuliCast\_30x: 00:00:06.5490000
TestSingleCast\_30x: 00:00:06.4440000
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我也测试了castclass和之间的区别isinst.根据我读过的内容:
http://m3mia.blogspot.com/2007/11/comparing-isinst-to-castclass.html
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/csharpcasts.aspx
http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/ Default.asp的?dotnet.12.635066.13
我认为即使没有例外,isinst也会比castclass快.但是,在创建自己的基准测试后,我发现isinst 比castclass 略慢.很有意思.这是我的结果:
TestEmptyLoop: 00:00:00.0870000
TestDCast\_castclass: 00:00:00.2640000
TestDCast\_isinst: 00:00:00.3780000
TestEmptyLoop: 00:00:00.0870000
TestDCast\_castclass: 00:00:00.2600000
TestDCast\_isinst: 00:00:00.3750000
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以,斯基特先生,我的立场得到了纠正.
环境:
Windows Vista
最高核心速度3.2Ghz
.NET Framework v2.0.50727
以下是我创建和运行的基准测试的完整来源:(使用此处提供的Jon Skeets Microbenchmarking框架)
using System;
using System.Collections;
public class CastingBenchmark
{
static Int64 Iterations=100000000;
static Int64 TestWork = 0;
public static void Init(string[] args)
{
if (args.Length>0)
Iterations = Int64.Parse(args[0]);
}
public static void Reset()
{
TestWork = 0;
}
internal class BaseType { public void TestBaseMethod() { TestWork++; } }
internal class DerivedType : BaseType {
public void TestDerivedMethod() { TestWork++; }
public void TestDerivedMethod2() { TestWork++; }
public void TestDerivedMethod3() { TestWork++; }
}
[Benchmark]
public static void TestMuliCast_3x()
{
BaseType TestBaseType = new DerivedType();
for (int x = 0; x < Iterations; x++)
{
((DerivedType)TestBaseType).TestDerivedMethod();
((DerivedType)TestBaseType).TestDerivedMethod2();
((DerivedType)TestBaseType).TestDerivedMethod3();
}
}
[Benchmark]
public static void TestSingleCast_3x()
{
BaseType TestBaseType = new DerivedType();
for (int x = 0; x < Iterations; x++)
{
DerivedType TestDerivedType = (DerivedType)TestBaseType;
TestDerivedType.TestDerivedMethod();
TestDerivedType.TestDerivedMethod2();
TestDerivedType.TestDerivedMethod3();
}
}
[Benchmark]
public static void TestMuliCast_30x()
{
BaseType TestBaseType = new DerivedType();
for (int x = 0; x < Iterations; x++)
{
//Simulate 3 x 10 method calls while casting
for (int y = 0; y < 10; y++) {
((DerivedType)TestBaseType).TestDerivedMethod();
((DerivedType)TestBaseType).TestDerivedMethod2();
((DerivedType)TestBaseType).TestDerivedMethod3();
}
}
}
[Benchmark]
public static void TestSingleCast_30x()
{
BaseType TestBaseType = new DerivedType();
for (int x = 0; x < Iterations; x++)
{
DerivedType TestDerivedType = (DerivedType)TestBaseType;
//Simulate 3 x 10 method calls on already-cast object
for (int y = 0; y < 10; y++)
{
TestDerivedType.TestDerivedMethod();
TestDerivedType.TestDerivedMethod2();
TestDerivedType.TestDerivedMethod3();
}
}
}
[Benchmark]
public static void TestEmptyLoop()
{
for (int x = 0; x < Iterations; x++)
{
}
}
[Benchmark]
public static void TestDCast_castclass()
{
BaseType TestDerivedType = new DerivedType();
for (int x = 0; x < Iterations; x++)
{
((DerivedType)TestDerivedType).TestDerivedMethod();
}
}
[Benchmark]
public static void TestDCast_isinst()
{
BaseType TestDerivedType = new DerivedType();
for (int x = 0; x < Iterations; x++)
{
(TestDerivedType as DerivedType).TestDerivedMethod();
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
由此产生的IL isinst和castclass方法:
method public hidebysig static void TestDCast_isinst() cil managed
{
.custom instance void BenchmarkAttribute::.ctor()
.maxstack 2
.locals init (
[0] class CastingBenchmark/BaseType TestDerivedType,
[1] int32 x)
L_0000: newobj instance void CastingBenchmark/DerivedType::.ctor()
L_0005: stloc.0
L_0006: ldc.i4.0
L_0007: stloc.1
L_0008: br.s L_0019
L_000a: ldloc.0
L_000b: isinst CastingBenchmark/DerivedType
L_0010: callvirt instance void CastingBenchmark/DerivedType::TestDerivedMethod()
L_0015: ldloc.1
L_0016: ldc.i4.1
L_0017: add
L_0018: stloc.1
L_0019: ldloc.1
L_001a: conv.i8
L_001b: ldsfld int64 CastingBenchmark::Iterations
L_0020: blt.s L_000a
L_0022: ret
}
.method public hidebysig static void TestDCast_castclass() cil managed
{
.custom instance void BenchmarkAttribute::.ctor()
.maxstack 2
.locals init (
[0] class CastingBenchmark/BaseType TestDerivedType,
[1] int32 x)
L_0000: newobj instance void CastingBenchmark/DerivedType::.ctor()
L_0005: stloc.0
L_0006: ldc.i4.0
L_0007: stloc.1
L_0008: br.s L_0019
L_000a: ldloc.0
L_000b: castclass CastingBenchmark/DerivedType
L_0010: callvirt instance void CastingBenchmark/DerivedType::TestDerivedMethod()
L_0015: ldloc.1
L_0016: ldc.i4.1
L_0017: add
L_0018: stloc.1
L_0019: ldloc.1
L_001a: conv.i8
L_001b: ldsfld int64 CastingBenchmark::Iterations
L_0020: blt.s L_000a
L_0022: ret
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)