如何取消任何当前的Parallel.ForEach并开始新鲜

Question

功能上有一长串单词绑定到ListView.使用TextBox for chars过滤单词列表.

任何新的char都需要取消任何处理后台过滤器.然后等待1秒钟(DispatcherTimer)以启动新的后台并行过滤器.

使用BackGroundWorker工作但不能将取消任何处理部分转换为并行.基本上需要"if(backgroundWorkerFTSfilter.IsBusy)backgroundWorkerFTSfilter.CancelAsync();" 在平行下.
如果我发生了这个错误,请告诉我.

private List<FTSword> fTSwordsFiltered = new List<FTSword>();
CancellationTokenSource ftsCts = new CancellationTokenSource();
ParallelOptions ftspo = new ParallelOptions();
// in ctor ftspo.CancellationToken = ftsCts.Token;

public List<FTSword> FTSwordsFiltered  // ListView bound to
{
    get { return fTSwordsFiltered; }
    set
    {
        if (fTSwordsFiltered == value) return;
        fTSwordsFiltered = value;
        NotifyPropertyChanged("FTSwordsFiltered");
    }
}
public string FTSwordFilter            // TextBox bound to
{
    get { return fTSwordFilter; }
    set
    {
        if (value == fTSwordFilter) return;

        fTSwordFilter = value;
        NotifyPropertyChanged("FTSwordFilter");

        // cancel any filter currently processing
        ftsCts.Cancel();   // fts filter              
        // with BackgroundWorker this was able to cancel               
        // if (backgroundWorkerFTSfilter.IsBusy) backgroundWorkerFTSfilter.CancelAsync();

        dispatcherTimerFTSfilter.Stop();
        // wait 1 second and apply filter in background
        dispatcherTimerFTSfilter.Start();
    }
}
private void dispatcherTimerFTSfilter_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    dispatcherTimerFTSfilter.Stop();
    List<FTSword> ftsWords = new List<FTSword>();
    //ftsCts = new CancellationTokenSource();  with these two it never cancels
    //ftspo.CancellationToken = ftsCts.Token;
    if (!(string.IsNullOrEmpty(FTSwordFilter)))
    {
        Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
        {

            try
            {
                Parallel.ForEach(FTSwords, ftspo, ftsw =>
                {
                    if (ftsw.WordStem.StartsWith(FTSwordFilter))
                    {
                        ftsWords.Add(ftsw);
                    }
                    ftspo.CancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
                });
                Thread.Sleep(1000);   // so the next key stoke has time
                FTSwordsFiltered = (List<FTSword>)ftsWords;
            }
            catch (OperationCanceledException ei)
            {
                // problem is that it is always cancelled from the cancel request before DispatchTimer
                Debug.WriteLine(ei.Message);
            }
            Debug.WriteLine(ftsWords.Count.ToString() + "parallel ");
        });           
    }
}

伊曼的回答让我想到了这一点

    if (!(string.IsNullOrEmpty(FTSwordFilter)))
    {
        string startWorkFilter = FTSwordFilter;
        Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
        {
            try
            {
                fTSwordsFilteredCancel = false;
                Parallel.ForEach(FTSwords, ftspo, (ftsw, loopstate) =>
                {
                    if (ftsw.WordStem.StartsWith(startWorkFilter))
                    {
                        ftsWords.Add(ftsw);
                    }
                    // Thread.Sleep(1);
                    if (fTSwordsFilteredCancel)
                    {
                        loopstate.Break();
                    }
                });
                Debug.WriteLine("fTSwordsFilteredCancel " + fTSwordsFilteredCancel.ToString());
                FTSwordsFiltered = (List<FTSword>)ftsWords;
                Debug.WriteLine(ftsWords.Count.ToString() + " parallel " + startWorkFilter);                       
            }
            catch (OperationCanceledException ei)
            {
                Debug.WriteLine(ei.Message);
            }
        });
    }

非常感谢我的答案,我会将它用于一些较长时间运行的任务或更长的列表,但是得到了如此出色的性能,我把它移到了get(仍然有1秒的延迟).导致更小的内存占用.相比800,000,它在不到1/10秒的时间内运行.

public IEnumerable<FTSword> FTSwordsFiltered
{
    get 
    { 
        if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(FTSwordFilter) || FTSwordFilter == "*") return FTSwords; 
        return FTSwords.AsParallel().Where(ftsWrd => ftsWrd.WordStem.StartsWith(FTSwordFilter));
    }

Answer 1

Parallel.ForEach自带ParallelLoopState对象.你可以使用这个对象打破循环.

您可以使用loopState.Break()或loopState.Stop()根据您的要求.

检查一下.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd991486.aspx