Nic*_*ner 10 f# structural-equality
我有一个包含功能的记录类型:
{foo : int; bar : int -> int}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我希望这种类型具有结构上的平等性.有什么方法可以说明bar在相等测试中应该忽略它吗?或者还有其他方法吗?
Ste*_*sen 18
请参阅Don 关于此主题的博客文章,特别是自定义平等和比较部分.
他给出的例子几乎与你提出的记录结构相同:
/// A type abbreviation indicating we’re using integers for unique stamps on objects
type stamp = int
/// A type containing a function that can’t be compared for equality
[<CustomEquality; CustomComparison>]
type MyThing =
{ Stamp: stamp;
Behaviour: (int -> int) }
override x.Equals(yobj) =
match yobj with
| :? MyThing as y -> (x.Stamp = y.Stamp)
| _ -> false
override x.GetHashCode() = hash x.Stamp
interface System.IComparable with
member x.CompareTo yobj =
match yobj with
| :? MyThing as y -> compare x.Stamp y.Stamp
| _ -> invalidArg "yobj" "cannot compare values of different types"
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
要更具体地回答您的原始问题,您可以创建一个自定义类型,其实例之间的比较始终为真:
[<CustomEquality; NoComparison>]
type StructurallyNull<'T> =
{ v: 'T }
override x.Equals(yobj) =
match yobj with
| :? StructurallyNull<'T> as y -> true
| _ -> false
override x.GetHashCode() = 0
type MyType = {
foo: int;
bar: StructurallyNull<int -> int>
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)