Redis serviceStack池连接客户端

Question

我正在设计一个使用Redis作为数据库的Web服务,我想知道使用Redis连接StackService客户端的最佳实践.

关键是我一直在阅读Redis,我发现与服务器交互的最佳方式是使用单个并发连接.

问题是,尽管每次Web客户端向Web服务发出请求时我都在使用PooledRedisClientManager,但我得到了一个连接到redis服务器的连接客户端(打开的连接),并且这个连接的客户端数量增加了更多的记忆.

样本'故障'代码:

PooledRedisClientManager pooledClientManager = new PooledRedisClientManager("localhost");
var redisClient = pooledClientManager.GetClient();
using (redisClient)
{
   redisClient.Set("key1", "value1");
}

我为解决这个问题所做的是创建一个用静态RedisClientvar 实现单例模式的类; 如果redisClient未初始化,则创建一个新的,如果是,则返回初始化的.

解:

public class CustomRedisPooledClient
{
    private static CustomRedisPooledClient _instance = null;
    public RedisClient redisClient = null;

    // Objeto sincronización para hacer el Lock 
    private static object syncLock = new object();

    private CustomRedisPooledClient()
    {
        redisClient = new RedisClient("localhost");
    }

    public static CustomRedisPooledClient GetPooledClient()
    {
        if (_instance == null)
        {
            lock (syncLock)
            {
                if (_instance == null)
                {
                    _instance = new CustomRedisPooledClient();
                }
            }
        }
        return _instance;
    }
}

CustomRedisPooledClient customRedisPooledClient = CustomRedisPooledClient.GetPooledClient();
using (customRedisPooledClient.redisClient)
{
    customRedisPooledClient.redisClient.Set("key1", "value1");
}

这是一个好习惯吗？

先感谢您!

Answer 1

我用过PooledRedisClientManager,它工作正常:

我只运行一次的示例代码:

static PooledRedisClientManager pooledClientManager = new PooledRedisClientManager("localhost");

和我在许多线程上运行的代码:

var redisClient = pooledClientManager.GetClient();
using (redisClient)
{
    redisClient.Set("key" + i.ToString(), "value1");
}

我只有11个客户端连接到服务器.