Lap*_*ven 41 asp.net-mvc caching design-patterns
我有一个基于MVC的站点,它使用存储库/服务模式进行数据访问.编写的服务用于大多数应用程序(控制台,winform和Web).目前,控制器直接与服务通信.这限制了应用适当缓存的能力.
我看到我的选项如下:
我可以看到每个人的利弊.使用Repository/Service进行缓存的最佳做法是什么?
Bre*_*ick 34
史蒂夫史密斯做了两篇很棒的博客文章,演示了如何使用他的CachedRepository模式来实现你正在寻找的结果.
在这两篇文章中,他向您展示了如何设置此模式,并解释了它为何有用.通过使用此模式,您可以获得缓存,而无需现有代码查看任何缓存逻辑.实际上,您使用缓存的存储库就像它是任何其他存储库一样.
public class CachedAlbumRepository : IAlbumRepository
{
private readonly IAlbumRepository _albumRepository;
public CachedAlbumRepository(IAlbumRepository albumRepository)
{
_albumRepository = albumRepository;
}
private static readonly object CacheLockObject = new object();
public IEnumerable<Album> GetTopSellingAlbums(int count)
{
Debug.Print("CachedAlbumRepository:GetTopSellingAlbums");
string cacheKey = "TopSellingAlbums-" + count;
var result = HttpRuntime.Cache[cacheKey] as List<Album>;
if (result == null)
{
lock (CacheLockObject)
{
result = HttpRuntime.Cache[cacheKey] as List<Album>;
if (result == null)
{
result = _albumRepository.GetTopSellingAlbums(count).ToList();
HttpRuntime.Cache.Insert(cacheKey, result, null,
DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(60), TimeSpan.Zero);
}
}
}
return result;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
小智 18
最简单的方法是在存储库提供程序中处理缓存.这样您就不必更改应用程序其余部分的任何代码; 它将忽略数据是从缓存而不是存储库提供的事实.
所以,我创建了一个控制器用来与后端通信的接口,在实现中我会添加缓存逻辑.用一些DI将它全部包裹起来,你的应用程序将被设置为易于测试.
根据Brendan提供的答案,我为很少更改但大量读取的相对较小列表的特殊情况定义了一个通用缓存存储库。
1. 界面
public interface IRepository<T> : IRepository
where T : class
{
IQueryable<T> AllNoTracking { get; }
IQueryable<T> All { get; }
DbSet<T> GetSet { get; }
T Get(int id);
void Insert(T entity);
void BulkInsert(IEnumerable<T> entities);
void Delete(T entity);
void RemoveRange(IEnumerable<T> range);
void Update(T entity);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
2.普通/非缓存存储库
public class Repository<T> : IRepository<T> where T : class, new()
{
private readonly IEfDbContext _context;
public Repository(IEfDbContext context)
{
_context = context;
}
public IQueryable<T> All => _context.Set<T>().AsQueryable();
public IQueryable<T> AllNoTracking => _context.Set<T>().AsNoTracking();
public IQueryable AllNoTrackingGeneric(Type t)
{
return _context.GetSet(t).AsNoTracking();
}
public DbSet<T> GetSet => _context.Set<T>();
public DbSet GetSetNonGeneric(Type t)
{
return _context.GetSet(t);
}
public IQueryable AllNonGeneric(Type t)
{
return _context.GetSet(t);
}
public T Get(int id)
{
return _context.Set<T>().Find(id);
}
public void Delete(T entity)
{
if (_context.Entry(entity).State == EntityState.Detached)
_context.Set<T>().Attach(entity);
_context.Set<T>().Remove(entity);
}
public void RemoveRange(IEnumerable<T> range)
{
_context.Set<T>().RemoveRange(range);
}
public void Insert(T entity)
{
_context.Set<T>().Add(entity);
}
public void BulkInsert(IEnumerable<T> entities)
{
_context.BulkInsert(entities);
}
public void Update(T entity)
{
_context.Set<T>().Attach(entity);
_context.Entry(entity).State = EntityState.Modified;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
}
3.通用缓存存储库基于非缓存存储库
public interface ICachedRepository<T> where T : class, new()
{
string CacheKey { get; }
void InvalidateCache();
void InsertIntoCache(T item);
}
public class CachedRepository<T> : ICachedRepository<T>, IRepository<T> where T : class, new()
{
private readonly IRepository<T> _modelRepository;
private static readonly object CacheLockObject = new object();
private IList<T> ThreadSafeCacheAccessAction(Action<IList<T>> action = null)
{
// refresh cache if necessary
var list = HttpRuntime.Cache[CacheKey] as IList<T>;
if (list == null)
{
lock (CacheLockObject)
{
list = HttpRuntime.Cache[CacheKey] as IList<T>;
if (list == null)
{
list = _modelRepository.All.ToList();
//TODO: remove hardcoding
HttpRuntime.Cache.Insert(CacheKey, list, null, DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(10), Cache.NoSlidingExpiration);
}
}
}
// execute custom action, if one is required
if (action != null)
{
lock (CacheLockObject)
{
action(list);
}
}
return list;
}
public IList<T> GetCachedItems()
{
IList<T> ret = ThreadSafeCacheAccessAction();
return ret;
}
/// <summary>
/// returns value without using cache, to allow Queryable usage
/// </summary>
public IQueryable<T> All => _modelRepository.All;
public IQueryable<T> AllNoTracking
{
get
{
var cachedItems = GetCachedItems();
return cachedItems.AsQueryable();
}
}
// other methods come here
public void BulkInsert(IEnumerable<T> entities)
{
var enumerable = entities as IList<T> ?? entities.ToList();
_modelRepository.BulkInsert(enumerable);
// also inserting items within the cache
ThreadSafeCacheAccessAction((list) =>
{
foreach (var item in enumerable)
list.Add(item);
});
}
public void Delete(T entity)
{
_modelRepository.Delete(entity);
ThreadSafeCacheAccessAction((list) =>
{
list.Remove(entity);
});
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用 DI 框架(我使用的是 Ninject),可以轻松定义是否应缓存存储库:
// IRepository<T> should be solved using Repository<T>, by default
kernel.Bind(typeof(IRepository<>)).To(typeof(Repository<>));
// IRepository<T> must be solved to Repository<T>, if used in CachedRepository<T>
kernel.Bind(typeof(IRepository<>)).To(typeof(Repository<>)).WhenInjectedInto(typeof(CachedRepository<>));
// explicit repositories using caching
var cachedTypes = new List<Type>
{
typeof(ImportingSystem), typeof(ImportingSystemLoadInfo), typeof(Environment)
};
cachedTypes.ForEach(type =>
{
// allow access as normal repository
kernel
.Bind(typeof(IRepository<>).MakeGenericType(type))
.To(typeof(CachedRepository<>).MakeGenericType(type));
// allow access as a cached repository
kernel
.Bind(typeof(ICachedRepository<>).MakeGenericType(type))
.To(typeof(CachedRepository<>).MakeGenericType(type));
});
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因此,从缓存存储库读取是在不知道缓存的情况下完成的。但是,更改它们需要注入ICacheRepository<>
和调用适当的方法。
归档时间: |
|
查看次数: |
23796 次 |
最近记录: |