std :: error_code,my_error :: check_block == my_error :: validate && my_error :: accept_block == my_error :: validate

gen*_*jix 8 c++ std error-code c++11

我正在使用std :: error_code并定义了一堆错误(使用枚举类)并注册了.

我有一个非常通用的错误,现在称为my_error :: validate,但是想在我的库中提供更具体的版本.一般人们会想要使用:

if (ec == bc::error::validate)
    // ...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

但是,有时他们可能希望看到与该std :: error_code相关的特定错误或打印错误消息.

// ec.message() says "check_block() failed to do XYZ"
assert(ec == bc::error::check_block);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我希望能够启用以下内容:

if (ec == bc::error::validate)
{
    if (ec == bc::error::check_block)
        // bc::error::check_block is a more specific case of bc::error::validate
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我似乎可以某种方式使用类别或条件?如何在不需要定义一大堆新的错误枚举的情况下做到这一点?它适用于库,因此该库的用户必须使用bc :: generic_error :: validate和bc :: error :: check_block.

代码如下:

#include <system_error>

namespace bc {

enum class error
{
    // storage errors
    missing_object = 1,
    object_already_exists,
    unspent_output,
    // transaction_pool errors
    bad_transaction,
    // network errors
    resolve_failed,
    network_unreachable,
    address_in_use,
    listen_failed,
    accept_failed,
    bad_stream,
    channel_stopped,
    channel_timeout,
    // validate
    validate_failed,
    check_block,
    accept_block,
    connect_block
};

class error_category_impl
  : public std::error_category
{
public:
    virtual const char* name() const;
    virtual std::string message(int ev) const;
    virtual std::error_condition default_error_condition(int ev) const;
};

const std::error_category& error_category();

std::error_code make_error_code(error e);
std::error_condition make_error_condition(error e);

} // bc

namespace std
{
    template <>
    struct is_error_code_enum<libbitcoin::error>
      : public true_type {};
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

和TU源文件:

#include <bc/error.hpp>

namespace bc {

const char* error_category_impl::name() const
{
    return "bitcoin";
}

std::string error_category_impl::message(int ev) const
{
    error ec = static_cast<error>(ev);
    switch (ec)
    {
        case error::missing_object:
            return "Object does not exist";
        case error::object_already_exists:
            return "Matching previous object found";
        case error::unspent_output:
            return "Unspent output";
        case error::bad_transaction:
            return "Transaction failed to validate";
        case error::resolve_failed:
            return "Resolving hostname failed";
        case error::network_unreachable:
            return "Unable to reach remote network";
        case error::address_in_use:
            return "Address already in use";
        case error::listen_failed:
            return "Listen incoming connections failed";
        case error::accept_failed:
            return "Accept connection failed";
        case error::bad_stream:
            return "Bad stream";
        case error::channel_stopped:
            return "Channel stopped";
        case error::channel_timeout:
            return "Channel timed out";
        default:
            return "Unknown error";
    }
}

std::error_condition
    error_category_impl::default_error_condition(int ev) const
{
    error ec = static_cast<error>(ev);
    switch (ec)
    {
        case error::check_block:
        case error::accept_block:
        case error::connect_block:
            //return error::validate_failed;
            return std::errc::permission_denied;
        default:
            return std::error_condition(ev, *this);
    }
}

const std::error_category& error_category()
{
    static error_category_impl instance;
    return instance;
}

std::error_code make_error_code(error e)
{
    return std::error_code(static_cast<int>(e), error_category());
}

std::error_condition make_error_condition(error e)
{
    return std::error_condition(static_cast<int>(e), error_category());
}

} // bc
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

gen*_*jix 11

好的,我从boost :: asio和std :: error_code创建者那里得到了帮助并掌握了自己:Chris Kohlhoff.

使用ADL时,一个好的经验法则是它不需要任何限定符(在我的情况下为error :: error_code_t),而且我的范围是错误的.

#include <iostream>
#include <system_error>

namespace libbitcoin {

namespace error
{
    // Specific errors
    enum error_code_t
    {
        // storage errors
        missing_object = 1,
        object_already_exists,
        unspent_output,
        // transaction_pool errors
        bad_transaction,
        // network errors
        resolve_failed,
        network_unreachable,
        address_in_use,
        listen_failed,
        accept_failed,
        bad_stream,
        channel_stopped,
        channel_timeout,
        // validate
        check_block,
        accept_block,
        connect_block
    };

    // error_condition
    enum error_condition_t
    {
        // validate
        validate_failed = 1
    };

    std::error_code make_error_code(error_code_t e);
    std::error_condition make_error_condition(error_condition_t e);
}

class error_category_impl
  : public std::error_category
{
public:
    virtual const char* name() const;
    virtual std::string message(int ev) const;
    virtual std::error_condition default_error_condition(int ev) const;
};

const std::error_category& error_category();

} // libbitcoin

namespace std
{
    template <>
    struct is_error_code_enum<libbitcoin::error::error_code_t>
      : public true_type {};

    template <>
    struct is_error_condition_enum<libbitcoin::error::error_condition_t>
      : public true_type {};
}

// -------------------------------------------------------------------

namespace libbitcoin {

namespace error {
std::error_code make_error_code(error_code_t e)
{
    return std::error_code(static_cast<int>(e), error_category());
}

std::error_condition make_error_condition(error_condition_t e)
{
    return std::error_condition(static_cast<int>(e), error_category());
}
}

const char* error_category_impl::name() const
{
    return "bitcoin";
}

std::string error_category_impl::message(int ev) const
{
    //error ec = static_cast<error>(ev);
    switch (ev)
    {
        case error::missing_object:
            return "Object does not exist";
        case error::object_already_exists:
            return "Matching previous object found";
        case error::unspent_output:
            return "Unspent output";
        case error::bad_transaction:
            return "Transaction failed to validate";
        case error::resolve_failed:
            return "Resolving hostname failed";
        case error::network_unreachable:
            return "Unable to reach remote network";
        case error::address_in_use:
            return "Address already in use";
        case error::listen_failed:
            return "Listen incoming connections failed";
        case error::accept_failed:
            return "Accept connection failed";
        case error::bad_stream:
            return "Bad stream";
        case error::channel_stopped:
            return "Channel stopped";
        case error::channel_timeout:
            return "Channel timed out";
        case error::check_block:
            return "Checkblk";
        default:
            return "Unknown error";
    }
}

std::error_condition
    error_category_impl::default_error_condition(int ev) const
{
    //error ec = static_cast<error>(ev);
    switch (ev)
    {
        case error::check_block:
        case error::accept_block:
        case error::connect_block:
            return std::error_condition(error::validate_failed, *this);
        default:
            return std::error_condition(ev, *this);
    }
}

const std::error_category& error_category()
{
    static error_category_impl instance;
    return instance;
}

} // libbitcoin

using namespace libbitcoin;

#include <assert.h>

int main()
{
    std::error_code ec = error::check_block;
    assert(ec == error::validate_failed);
    assert(ec == error::check_block);
    std::cout << ec.message() << std::endl;
    //ec = error::missing_object;
    return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • 很有意思 !现在关于如何在C++ 11中实现自定义错误消息的例子不多,所以你的答案是一个非常有价值的资源.为了记录,我确实研究了一下你的问题,意识到你必须验证一个error_condition并将它映射到accept_block/check_block等,但无法弄清楚如何.看到最终在这种情况下,普通枚举比C++ 11枚举类更好,因为它们在命名空间中具有全局可见性,这是​​非常有趣的! (2认同)