And*_*rew 90 sql activerecord ruby-on-rails has-many
这似乎相当简单,但我不能让它出现在Google上.
如果我有:
class City < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :photos
end
class Photo < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :city
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想找到所有没有照片的城市.我很乐意打电话给...
City.where( photos.empty? )
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
......但那不存在.那么,你如何做这种查询?
更新: 现在找到原始问题的答案,我很好奇,你如何构建逆?
IE:如果我想创建这些作为范围:
scope :without_photos, includes(:photos).where( :photos => {:city_id=>nil} )
scope :with_photos, ???
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
And*_*rew 124
Bah,在这里找到它:https://stackoverflow.com/a/5570221/417872
City.includes(:photos).where(photos: { city_id: nil })
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
TeW*_*eWu 48
在Rails 5中,要找到所有没有照片的城市,您可以使用left_outer_joins
:
City.left_outer_joins(:photos).where(photos: {id: nil})
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这将导致SQL如下:
SELECT cities.*
FROM cities LEFT OUTER JOIN photos ON photos.city_id = city.id
WHERE photos.id IS NULL
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用includes
:
City.includes(:photos).where(photos: {id: nil})
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
会有相同的结果,但会产生更加丑陋的SQL:
SELECT cities.id AS t0_r0, cities.attr1 AS t0_r1, cities.attr2 AS t0_r2, cities.created_at AS t0_r3, cities.updated_at AS t0_r4, photos.id AS t1_r0, photos.city_id AS t1_r1, photos.attr1 AS t1_r2, photos.attr2 AS t1_r3, photos.created_at AS t1_r4, photos.updated_at AS t1_r5
FROM cities LEFT OUTER JOIN photos ON photos.city_id = cities.id
WHERE photos.id IS NULL
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Yos*_*sho 23
尝试查找连接表中没有匹配记录的记录时,需要使用LEFT OUTER JOIN
scope :with_photos, joins('LEFT OUTER JOIN photos ON cities.id = photos.city_id').group('cities.id').having('count(photos.id) > 0')
scope :without_photos, joins('LEFT OUTER JOIN photos ON cities.id = photos.city_id').group('cities.id').having('count(photos.id) = 0')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我用了一个连接以获取所有的人与照片:
scope :with_photos, -> { joins(:photos).distinct }
对于特定情况,更容易编写和理解.不过,我不确定连接和做包含的效率是多少
归档时间: |
|
查看次数: |
34568 次 |
最近记录: |