Mic*_*son 36 d3.js force-layout
我是D3的新手,无法设置我的力导向布局的界限.我已经成功地(从示例中)拼凑了我想要的东西,但我需要包含图表.在tick函数中,transform/translate将正确显示我的图形,但是当我使用带有Math.max/min的cx和cy时(参见注释代码),节点固定在左上角,同时正确包含线条.
以下是我的内容......我做错了什么?
var w=960, h=500, r=8, z = d3.scale.category20();
var color = d3.scale.category20();
var force = d3.layout.force()
.linkDistance( function(d) { return (d.value*180) } )
.linkStrength( function(d) { return (1/(1+d.value)) } )
.charge(-1000)
//.gravity(.08)
.size([w, h]);
var vis = d3.select("#chart").append("svg:svg")
.attr("width", w)
.attr("height", h)
.append("svg:g")
.attr("transform", "translate(" + w / 4 + "," + h / 3 + ")");
vis.append("svg:rect")
.attr("width", w)
.attr("height", h)
.style("stroke", "#000");
d3.json("miserables.json", function(json) {
var link = vis.selectAll("line.link")
.data(json.links);
link.enter().append("svg:line")
.attr("class", "link")
.attr("x1", function(d) { return d.source.x; })
.attr("y1", function(d) { return d.source.y; })
.attr("x2", function(d) { return d.source.x; })
.attr("y2", function(d) { return d.source.y; })
.style("stroke-width", function(d) { return (1/(1+d.value))*5 });
var node = vis.selectAll("g.node")
.data(json.nodes);
var nodeEnter = node.enter().append("svg:g")
.attr("class", "node")
.on("mouseover", fade(.1))
.on("mouseout", fade(1))
.call(force.drag);
nodeEnter.append("svg:circle")
.attr("r", r)
.style("fill", function(d) { return z(d.group); })
.style("stroke", function(d) { return
d3.rgb(z(d.group)).darker(); });
nodeEnter.append("svg:text")
.attr("text-anchor", "middle")
.attr("dy", ".35em")
.text(function(d) { return d.name; });
force
.nodes(json.nodes)
.links(json.links)
.on("tick", tick)
.start();
function tick() {
// This works
node.attr("transform", function(d) { return "translate(" + d.x + ","
+ d.y + ")"; });
// This contains the lines within the boundary, but the nodes are
stuck in the top left corner
//node.attr("cx", function(d) { return d.x = Math.max(r, Math.min(w
- r, d.x)); })
// .attr("cy", function(d) { return d.y = Math.max(r, Math.min(h -
r, d.y)); });
link.attr("x1", function(d) { return d.source.x; })
.attr("y1", function(d) { return d.source.y; })
.attr("x2", function(d) { return d.target.x; })
.attr("y2", function(d) { return d.target.y; });
}
var linkedByIndex = {};
json.links.forEach(function(d) {
linkedByIndex[d.source.index + "," + d.target.index] = 1;
});
function isConnected(a, b) {
return linkedByIndex[a.index + "," + b.index] ||
linkedByIndex[b.index + "," + a.index] || a.index == b.index;
}
function fade(opacity) {
return function(d) {
node.style("stroke-opacity", function(o) {
thisOpacity = isConnected(d, o) ? 1 : opacity;
this.setAttribute('fill-opacity', thisOpacity);
return thisOpacity;
});
link.style("stroke-opacity", opacity).style("stroke-opacity",
function(o) {
return o.source === d || o.target === d ? 1 : opacity;
});
};
}
});
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
mbo*_*ock 61
有一个边界框例如在我的发力布局的谈话.位置Verlet集成允许您在"tick"事件侦听器中定义几何约束(例如边界框和碰撞检测); 只需移动节点以符合约束,模拟就会相应调整.
也就是说,引力绝对是处理这个问题的一种更灵活的方式,因为它允许用户暂时将图形拖到边界框之外,然后图形将恢复.根据图形的大小和显示区域的大小,您应该尝试不同的重力和电荷(排斥)的相对强度,以使图形适合.
定制力量也是一种可能的解决方案。我更喜欢这种方法,因为不仅显示的节点被重新定位,而且整个模拟都与边界力一起工作。
let simulation = d3.forceSimulation(nodes)
...
.force("bounds", boxingForce);
// Custom force to put all nodes in a box
function boxingForce() {
const radius = 500;
for (let node of nodes) {
// Of the positions exceed the box, set them to the boundary position.
// You may want to include your nodes width to not overlap with the box.
node.x = Math.max(-radius, Math.min(radius, node.x));
node.y = Math.max(-radius, Math.min(radius, node.y));
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)