cro*_*don 13 ruby-on-rails rspec2 rspec-rails ruby-on-rails-3
我的测试套件中的所有211规格都正常通过...直到我从rails 3.2升级到rails 3.2.1.现在197我的规格失败了.大多数这些错误都有"错误的参数数量(0表示1)"错误,如下所述.
示例#1:
class DocumentLibrary < ActiveRecord::Base
extend FriendlyId
friendly_id :title, :use => :slugged
has_many :shelves, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :documents, :through => :shelves
validates :title, :presence => true, :uniqueness => true
default_scope :order => :title
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
规格:
it "can be shown on the company menu" do
dl = FactoryGirl.create(:document_library, :title => 'Test', :menu => false, :company => true)
dl.should be_valid
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
失败:
1) DocumentLibrary can be shown on the company menu
Failure/Error: dl = FactoryGirl.create(:document_library, title: 'Test', menu: false, company: true)
ArgumentError:
wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
# ./spec/models/document_library_spec.rb:6:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果我在FactoryGirl.create行之前调用调试器,我得到:
/Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/activesupport-3.2.1/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:252:
(rdb:1) c
/Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/activesupport-3.2.1/lib/active_support/core_ext/module/remove_method.rb:4: `' (NilClass)
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:249:in `set_it_up'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:200:in `subclass'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:187:in `describe'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/dsl.rb:18:in `describe'
from /Users/Jason/code/rails/teamsite/spec/models/document_library_spec.rb:4:in `<top (required)>'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:698:in `load'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:698:in `block in load_spec_files'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:698:in `map'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:698:in `load_spec_files'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:22:in `run'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:80:in `run_in_process'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:69:in `run'
from /Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun'
/Users/Jason/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/activesupport-3.2.1/lib/active_support/core_ext/module/remove_method.rb:4:
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
例#2
class Album < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :photo_library
validates :title, :presence => true
validates :title, :uniqueness => {scope: :photo_library_id}
end
class PhotoLibrary < ActiveRecord::Base
default_scope :order => :title
has_many :albums, :dependent => :destroy
validates :title, :presence => true
validates :title, :uniqueness => true
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
规格:
before :each do
@photo_library = FactoryGirl.create(:photo_library, title: 'Products')
login_admin
end
it "destroys an album" do
3.times { FactoryGirl.create(:album, photo_library: @photo_library) }
visit photo_library_path(@photo_library)
find("h3").click_link 'Delete'
find("#notice").should have_content("Album deleted successfully")
Album.count.should eq 2
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
失败:
1) Albums destroys an album
Failure/Error: login_admin
ArgumentError:
wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
# ./app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb:8:in `create'
# (eval):2:in `click_button'
# ./spec/requests/albums_spec.rb:7:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我的sessions_controller中的第8行是:
user = User.find_by_email(params[:email])
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
此时检查params显示所有内容(包括:email)都应该存在.
对比例#3
FactoryGirl的这个规范很好:
it "is unique within a library" do
pl = FactoryGirl.create(:photo_library, title: 'Products')
pl2 = FactoryGirl.create(:photo_library, title: 'Competitors')
a = FactoryGirl.create(:album, title: 'Gold Series', photo_library: pl)
na = Album.create(photo_library_id: pl.id, title: 'Gold Series')
na.should_not be_valid
na.title = 'Cyclone'
na.should be_valid
na = Album.create(photo_library_id: pl2.id, title: 'Gold Series')
na.should be_valid
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
工厂定义如下:
factory :document_library do
sequence(:title) { |n| "Library Title#{n}" }
end
factory :photo_library do
sequence(:title) { |n| "Photo Library Title#{n}" }
end
factory :album do
sequence(:title) {|n| "Album#{n}"}
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果我从DocumentLibrary模型中注释掉FriendlyId行,则示例#1通过.我不知道为什么会有所作为.
但是,有些规格仍未通过.考虑以下模型(不使用FriendlyId)和3.2.1中的漏洞规范:
class DrawingLibrary < ActiveRecord::Base
validates :title, :presence => true
default_scope order: :title
has_many :drawings, :dependent => :destroy
end
it "displays in alpha order" do
FactoryGirl.create(:drawing_library, title: 'C')
FactoryGirl.create(:drawing_library, title: 'B')
FactoryGirl.create(:drawing_library, title: 'A')
ts = ''
DrawingLibrary.all.each do |draw_lib|
ts += draw_lib.title
end
ts.should eq 'ABC'
end
1) DrawingLibrary displays in alpha order
Failure/Error: DrawingLibrary.all.each do |draw_lib|
ArgumentError:
wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
# ./spec/models/drawing_library_spec.rb:19:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
结果:rspec spec/models/document_library_spec.rb --backtrace
1) DocumentLibrary can be shown on the company menu
Failure/Error: dl = FactoryGirl.create(:document_library, title: 'Test', menu: false, company: true)
ArgumentError:
wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
# ./spec/models/document_library_spec.rb:6:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我正在使用rvm和ruby 1.9.3,Rubygems是1.8.16.Factory Girl是2.6.0,factory_girl_rails是1.7.0.rspec-rails是2.8.1.
这是我目前所知道的:
任何人都能指出我的方向吗?或提供故障排除建议?
这是我的Gemfile:
source 'http://rubygems.org'
gem 'rails', '3.2.1'
gem 'mysql2'
gem 'dynamic_form'
gem 'friendly_id'
group :assets do
gem 'sass-rails', " ~> 3.2.3"
gem 'coffee-rails', "~> 3.2.1"
gem 'uglifier', '>= 1.0.3'
end
gem 'jquery-rails'
gem 'therubyracer'
gem 'bcrypt-ruby'
gem 'capistrano'
gem "paperclip", :git => "git://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip.git"
group :test, :development do
gem 'rspec-rails'
gem 'launchy'
gem 'ruby-debug19'
gem 'database_cleaner'
gem 'capybara-webkit'
gem 'spork', '~> 0.9.0.rc'
gem 'guard-spork'
end
group :development do
gem 'fuubar'
gem 'powder'
end
group :test do
gem 'turn', :require => false
gem 'capybara'
gem 'factory_girl_rails'
gem 'guard-rspec'
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
升级到Rails 3.2.1后,Gemfile.lock的唯一区别在于Rails核心库(没有更改测试宝石).
这可能不是根本原因,但由于您的错误提示 FactoryGirl,我首先将所有工厂(及其创建)转换为另一种(新/推荐(?))语法,即FactoryGirl.define do ...
和doclib = FactoryGirl.create(:document_library ...
。运行规范时可能会Factory
有所不同(与控制台中的情况不同)。
归档时间: |
|
查看次数: |
2467 次 |
最近记录: |