使用trylock:
FILE *fp;
pthread_mutex_t demoMutex;
void * printHello (void* threadId)
{
pthread_mutex_trylock (&demoMutex);
pthread_t writeToFile = pthread_self ();
unsigned short iterate;
for (iterate = 0; iterate < 10000; iterate++)
{
fprintf (fp, " %d ", iterate, 4);
fprintf (fp, " %lu ", writeToFile, sizeof (pthread_t));
fprintf (fp, "\n", writeToFile, 1);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock (&demoMutex);
pthread_exit (NULL);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后是main():
int main ()
{
pthread_t arrayOfThreadId [5];
int returnValue;
unsigned int iterate;
fp = fopen ("xyz", "w");
pthread_mutex_init (&demoMutex, NULL);
for (iterate = 0; iterate < 5; iterate++)
{
if (returnValue = pthread_create (&arrayOfThreadId [iterate],
NULL,
printHello,
(void*) &arrayOfThreadId [iterate]) != 0)
{
printf ("\nerror: pthread_create failed with error number %d", returnValue);
}
}
for (iterate = 0; iterate < 5; iterate++)
pthread_join (arrayOfThreadId [iterate], NULL);
return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这里输出首先打印一些第一个线程然后打印其余部分,然后再打印第一个线程.锁不起作用.如果我更换相同的pthread_mutex_lock
东西,每个东西都会顺序显示!
这里有什么荒谬的错误?
caf*_*caf 28
pthread_mutex_trylock()
没有测试结果就打电话没有意义.
如果未能获得互斥体,你应该不进入临界区,你应该不晚解锁.例如,您可以像这样重写它(请注意,您对如何fprintf()
调用也非常困惑):
void *printHello(void *threadId)
{
if (pthread_mutex_trylock(&demoMutex) == 0)
{
unsigned short iterate;
for (iterate = 0; iterate < 10000; iterate++)
{
fprintf (fp, " %d\n", iterate);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock (&demoMutex);
}
pthread_exit (NULL);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,使用它pthread_mutex_lock()
代替可能更有意义pthread_mutex_trylock()
,因此如果争用的话,你的线程将等待互斥锁可用. pthread_mutex_lock()
在几乎所有情况下都是你想要的; 该_trylock
变体仅用于优化一些不寻常的情况 - 如果您遇到_trylock
需要的情况,您就会知道.
小智 6
...
while (pthread_mutex_trylock(&demoMutex) == 0)
...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你的代码毫无意义.强行锁定在哪里?这就像一个不工作的螺旋锁使用更多的CPU?!
trylock锁定时返回0,所以:
if(!pthread_mutex_trylock(&demoMutex))
{
// mutex locked
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果获取了互斥锁引用的互斥对象上的锁,则pthread_mutex_trylock()函数将返回零.否则,返回错误号以指示错误.
小智 6
caf 对如何使用它有很好的回答。我只需要为自己解释这个解释,但是我确实了解到pthread_mutex_lock()
课堂上的开销要大得多,并且只是使用<time.h>
lib对其进行了测试,并且我的循环的性能显着提高。只是加上那两美分,因为他提到也许你应该pthread_mutex_lock()
改用!
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#define NUM_THREADS 4
#define LOOPS 100000
int counter;
pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
// using pthread_mutex_lock
void* worker() {
for (int i = 0; i < LOOPS; i++) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
counter++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
// using try_lock - obviously only use one at a time
void* worker() {
for (int i = 0; i < LOOPS; i++) {
while (pthread_mutex_trylock(&mutex) != 0) {
// wait - treated as spin lock in this example
}
counter++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
clock_t begin = clock();
pthread_t t[NUM_THREADS];
int rc;
counter = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) {
rc = pthread_create(&t[i], NULL, worker, NULL);
if (rc) {
printf("Thread #%d failed\n", i);
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) {
pthread_join(t[i], NULL);
}
printf("%d\n", counter);
clock_t end = clock();
double time = (double)(end - begin) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
printf("Time Spent: %f", time);
return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
很明显,你会注释掉一个工人来测试它,但如果你尝试一下,我得到Time Spent: 1.36200
的平均值为pthread_mutex_lock()
和Time Spent: 0.36714
的pthread_mutex_trylock()
。
如果你使用 Atomics,速度会更快。