考虑将等式方法添加到以下类简单点:
public class Point {
private final int x;
private final int y;
public Point(int x, int y) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}
public int getX() {
return x;
}
public int getY() {
return y;
}
// ...
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
//我对equals的定义
public boolean equals(Point other) {
return (this.getX() == other.getX() && this.getY() == other.getY());
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这种方法有什么问题?乍一看,似乎工作正常:
Point p1 = new Point(1, 2);
Point p2 = new Point(1, 2);
Point q = new Point(2, 3);
System.out.println(p1.equals(p2)); // prints true
System.out.println(p1.equals(q)); // prints false
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,一旦开始将点放入集合中,就会出现问题:
import java.util.HashSet;
HashSet<Point> coll = new HashSet<Point>();
coll.add(p1);
System.out.println(coll.contains(p2)); // prints false
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
即使p1被添加到它,并且p1和p2是相等的对象,它怎么可能不包含p2?
虽然您应该在实施hashCode()时实施equals(),但这不会导致您的问题.
这不是equals()您正在寻找的方法.equals方法必须始终具有以下签名:"public boolean equals(Object object)".这是一些代码.
public boolean equals(Object object)
{
if (object == null)
{
return false;
}
if (this == object)
{
return true;
}
if (object instanceof Point)
{
Point point = (Point)object;
... now do the comparison.
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
该阿帕奇EqualsBuilder类是平等的实现是有用的.该链接是旧版本,但仍适用.
如果你喜欢Apache EqualsBuilder,你可能也会喜欢Apache HashCodeBuilder类.
编辑:更新了标准快捷方式的equals方法示例.