我正在尝试使用德州仪器的例子编写一些微控制器代码,并且它在任何地方使用宏(可能减少代码大小),其中一些被st()包围.阅读评论后,我仍然不明白为什么这是必要的或何时应该使用它:
/*
* This macro is for use by other macros to form a fully valid C statement.
* Without this, the if/else conditionals could show unexpected behavior.
*
* For example, use...
* #define SET_REGS() st( ioreg1 = 0; ioreg2 = 0; )
* instead of ...
* #define SET_REGS() { ioreg1 = 0; ioreg2 = 0; }
* or
* #define SET_REGS() ioreg1 = 0; ioreg2 = 0;
* The last macro would not behave as expected in the if/else construct.
* The second to last macro will cause a compiler error in certain uses
* of if/else construct
*
* It is not necessary, or recommended, to use this macro where there is
* already a valid C statement. For example, the following is redundant...
* #define CALL_FUNC() st( func(); )
* This should simply be...
* #define CALL_FUNC() func()
*
* (The while condition below evaluates false without generating a
* constant-controlling-loop type of warning on most compilers.)
*/
#define st(x) do { x } while (__LINE__ == -1)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你能举一些例子说明当st不存在时会失败吗?在没有必要的情况下添加st有什么危害吗?
可能st代表什么?第二个示例何时{ something }产生编译器错误?因为在某些示例代码中也使用了它.
"do {...} while(0)"是一种用于避免某些类型问题的技术.
将__LINE__ == -1可能被用来避免一些编译器警告.__LINE__ == -1永远都是假的.
看看这个链接,它将解释"do ... while(0)"的原因
http://cnicholson.net/2009/02/stupid-c-tricks-adventures-in-assert/
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
847 次 |
| 最近记录: |