Inc*_*ito 5 sql postgresql performance
我有一条select语句,可以从更复杂的角度进行非常简单的查询:
我有一个相当简单的选择语句。
SELECT
uid
FROM userpermissions
WHERE
uid = :whoami
AND
application = :application
AND
subsystem = :subsystem
;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我的观点只是ints和varchars,而是四个表的联接(可能是真正的问题)。
View "public.userpermissions"
Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Description
-------------+------------------------+-----------+----------+-------------
uid | integer | | plain |
gid | integer | | plain |
sid | integer | | plain |
name | character varying(128) | | extended |
application | character varying(128) | | extended |
subsystem | character varying(128) | | extended |
View definition:
SELECT users.uid, groups.gid, groupaccess.sid, groups.name, subsystems.application, subsystems.subsystem
FROM users
JOIN groups ON groups.gid = users.gid
JOIN groupaccess ON groups.gid = groupaccess.gid
JOIN subsystems ON subsystems.sid = groupaccess.sid;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我不确定如何有效地更新视图,以使查询更有效,因为它们现在大约需要1-4秒,在某些情况下最多需要8秒。
我的另一个想法是使用内存缓存,但是这似乎是解决视图效率低下问题的临时解决方案。
这是选择的个人资料:
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=1.18..4.54 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.043..0.043 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (groups.gid = users.gid)
-> Nested Loop (cost=1.18..3.34 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.040..0.040 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=1.18..2.78 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.039..0.039 rows=0 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (groupaccess.sid = subsystems.sid)
-> Seq Scan on groupaccess (cost=0.00..1.43 rows=43 width=8) (actual time=0.014..0.014 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=1.17..1.17 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.017..0.017 rows=0 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 0kB
-> Seq Scan on subsystems (cost=0.00..1.17 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.015..0.015 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: (((application)::text = 'LoginLink'::text) AND ((subsystem)::text = '1'::text))
-> Index Scan using groups_pkey on groups (cost=0.00..0.55 rows=1 width=4) (never executed)
Index Cond: (gid = groupaccess.gid)
-> Seq Scan on users (cost=0.00..1.19 rows=1 width=8) (never executed)
Filter: (uid = 2)
Total runtime: 0.192 ms
(15 rows)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这完全让我感到困惑,因为使用PHP将其放入PDO的那一刻查询花费了几秒钟,而不是几分之一秒。
视图不利于性能。简化事物,授予特定权利以及其中一些权利是很好的。但这对查询性能没有好处。
您可以尝试切出中间人(视图)并使用以下查询:
SELECT u.uid
FROM users u
JOIN groupaccess g USING (gid)
JOIN subsystems s USING (sid)
WHERE u.uid = :whoami
AND s.application = :application
AND s.subsystem = :subsystem;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这也切出了另一个中间人table groups,这在您的方案中根本不需要。(除非可能缺少用户的连接行,否则应该是不可能的。)
为了提高性能,您必须使该实例化视图完全不同。