索引与Postgresql联接的视图?

Inc*_*ito 5 sql postgresql performance

我有一条select语句,可以从更复杂的角度进行非常简单的查询:

我有一个相当简单的选择语句。

    SELECT
          uid
    FROM userpermissions
    WHERE
            uid         = :whoami
        AND
            application = :application
        AND
            subsystem   = :subsystem
    ;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我的观点只是ints和varchars,而是四个表的联接(可能是真正的问题)。

                       View "public.userpermissions"
   Column    |          Type          | Modifiers | Storage  | Description
-------------+------------------------+-----------+----------+-------------
 uid         | integer                |           | plain    |
 gid         | integer                |           | plain    |
 sid         | integer                |           | plain    |
 name        | character varying(128) |           | extended |
 application | character varying(128) |           | extended |
 subsystem   | character varying(128) |           | extended |
View definition:
 SELECT users.uid, groups.gid, groupaccess.sid, groups.name, subsystems.application, subsystems.subsystem
   FROM users
   JOIN groups ON groups.gid = users.gid
   JOIN groupaccess ON groups.gid = groupaccess.gid
   JOIN subsystems ON subsystems.sid = groupaccess.sid;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我不确定如何有效地更新视图,以使查询更有效,因为它们现在大约需要1-4秒,在某些情况下最多需要8秒。

我的另一个想法是使用内存缓存,但是这似乎是解决视图效率低下问题的临时解决方案。

这是选择的个人资料:

                                                        QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nested Loop  (cost=1.18..4.54 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.043..0.043 rows=0 loops=1)
   Join Filter: (groups.gid = users.gid)
   ->  Nested Loop  (cost=1.18..3.34 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.040..0.040 rows=0 loops=1)
         ->  Hash Join  (cost=1.18..2.78 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.039..0.039 rows=0 loops=1)
               Hash Cond: (groupaccess.sid = subsystems.sid)
               ->  Seq Scan on groupaccess  (cost=0.00..1.43 rows=43 width=8) (actual time=0.014..0.014 rows=1 loops=1)
               ->  Hash  (cost=1.17..1.17 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.017..0.017 rows=0 loops=1)
                     Buckets: 1024  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 0kB
                     ->  Seq Scan on subsystems  (cost=0.00..1.17 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.015..0.015 rows=0 loops=1)
                           Filter: (((application)::text = 'LoginLink'::text) AND ((subsystem)::text = '1'::text))
         ->  Index Scan using groups_pkey on groups  (cost=0.00..0.55 rows=1 width=4) (never executed)
               Index Cond: (gid = groupaccess.gid)
   ->  Seq Scan on users  (cost=0.00..1.19 rows=1 width=8) (never executed)
         Filter: (uid = 2)
 Total runtime: 0.192 ms
(15 rows)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这完全让我感到困惑,因为使用PHP将其放入PDO的那一刻查询花费了几秒钟,而不是几分之一秒。

Erw*_*ter 7

视图不利于性能。简化事物,授予特定权利以及其中一些权利是很好的。但这对查询性能没有好处。

您可以尝试切出中间人(视图)并使用以下查询:

SELECT u.uid
FROM   users u
JOIN   groupaccess g USING (gid)
JOIN   subsystems  s USING (sid)
WHERE  u.uid = :whoami
  AND  s.application = :application
  AND  s.subsystem   = :subsystem;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这也切出了另一个中间人table groups,这在您的方案中根本不需要。(除非可能缺少用户的连接行,否则应该是不可能的。)

为了提高性能,您必须使该实例化视图完全不同。