zig*_*ggy 0 java oop concurrency multithreading
class ZiggyTest{
public static void main(String[] args){
RunnableThread rt = new RunnableThread();
Thread t1 = new Thread(rt);
Thread t2 = new Thread(rt);
Thread t3 = new Thread(rt);
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.setPriority(10);
t3.start();
try{
t3.join();
t2.join();
t1.join();
System.out.println("Joined");
}catch(InterruptedException e){System.out.println(e);}
Thread t4 = new Thread(new RunnableThread());
Thread t5 = new Thread(new RunnableThread());
Thread t6 = new Thread(new RunnableThread());
t4.start();
t5.start();
t6.start();
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
上述测试产生以下输出
Thread-0
Thread-0
Thread-0
Thread-0
Thread-0
Thread-2
Thread-2
Thread-2
Thread-2
Thread-2
Thread-1
Thread-1
Thread-1
Thread-1
Thread-1
Joined
Thread-3
Thread-3
Thread-4
Thread-4
Thread-3
Thread-4
Thread-5
Thread-4
Thread-3
Thread-4
Thread-5
Thread-3
Thread-5
Thread-5
Thread-5
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我不明白为什么最后三个线程没有像前三个线程一样使用String对象作为共享锁.即使最后三个线程使用的是'RunnableThread'的不同实例,也不应该同步它们,因为字符串常量池中只有一个'str'副本?
谢谢
哎呀..我忘了包含RunnableThread.
class RunnableThread implements Runnable{
String str = "HELLO";
public void run(){
runMe();
}
public synchronized void runMe(){
for (int a : new int[]{1,2,3,4,5}){
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName());
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你的线程不会在任何String对象上同步,更不用说同一个了,所以我不确定这个想法来自何处.RunnableThread由于synchronized此行中的关键字,它们在对象本身上同步:
public synchronized void runMe(){
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
RunnableThread为最后三个线程使用单独的对象意味着它们独立运行.
现在,如果您确实想要锁定该全局String对象,则该方法将如下所示
public void runMe(){
synchronized (str) {
for (int a : new int[]{1,2,3,4,5}){
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName());
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是一个好主意str final.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
148 次 |
| 最近记录: |