Abd*_*med 28
您可以使用此方法:
boolean isAlive()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果线程仍处于活动状态,则返回true;如果线程已死,则返回false.这不是一成不变的.您需要对Thread类的对象的引用.
还有一个提示:如果您正在检查它的状态以使主线程在新线程仍在运行时等待,则可以使用join()方法.它更方便.
Thread.State枚举类和新的getState() API 用于查询线程的执行状态。
一个线程在给定的时间点只能处于一种状态。这些状态是虚拟机状态,不反映任何操作系统线程状态[ NEW, RUNNABLE, BLOCKED, WAITING, TIMED_WAITING, TERMINATED]。
enum Thread.State扩展了 Enum 实现了Serializable , Comparable
getState()jdk5 - public State getState() {...} « 返回this线程的状态。此方法设计用于监视系统状态,而不是用于同步控制。
的IsAlive() - public final native boolean isAlive(); « 返回真,如果在调用它的线程还活着,否则返回假。如果线程已启动且尚未死亡,则该线程处于活动状态。
类java.lang.Thread和sun.misc.VM.
package java.lang;
public class Thread implements Runnable {
public final native boolean isAlive();
// Java thread status value zero corresponds to state "NEW" - 'not yet started'.
private volatile int threadStatus = 0;
public enum State {
NEW, RUNNABLE, BLOCKED, WAITING, TIMED_WAITING, TERMINATED;
}
public State getState() {
return sun.misc.VM.toThreadState(threadStatus);
}
}
package sun.misc;
public class VM {
// ...
public static Thread.State toThreadState(int threadStatus) {
if ((threadStatus & JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_RUNNABLE) != 0) {
return Thread.State.RUNNABLE;
} else if ((threadStatus & JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_BLOCKED_ON_MONITOR_ENTER) != 0) {
return Thread.State.BLOCKED;
} else if ((threadStatus & JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_WAITING_INDEFINITELY) != 0) {
return Thread.State.WAITING;
} else if ((threadStatus & JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_WAITING_WITH_TIMEOUT) != 0) {
return Thread.State.TIMED_WAITING;
} else if ((threadStatus & JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_TERMINATED) != 0) {
return Thread.State.TERMINATED;
} else if ((threadStatus & JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_ALIVE) == 0) {
return Thread.State.NEW;
} else {
return Thread.State.RUNNABLE;
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
实施例与java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch执行多个线程并行地,在完成所有线程主线程执行之后。(直到并行线程完成它们的任务,主线程才会被阻塞。)
public class MainThread_Wait_TillWorkerThreadsComplete {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
System.out.println("Main Thread Started...");
// countDown() should be called 4 time to make count 0. So, that await() will release the blocking threads.
int latchGroupCount = 4;
CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(latchGroupCount);
new Thread(new Task(2, latch), "T1").start();
new Thread(new Task(7, latch), "T2").start();
new Thread(new Task(5, latch), "T3").start();
new Thread(new Task(4, latch), "T4").start();
//latch.countDown(); // Decrements the count of the latch group.
// await() method block until the current count reaches to zero
latch.await(); // block until latchGroupCount is 0
System.out.println("Main Thread completed.");
}
}
class Task extends Thread {
CountDownLatch latch;
int iterations = 10;
public Task(int iterations, CountDownLatch latch) {
this.iterations = iterations;
this.latch = latch;
}
@Override
public void run() {
String threadName = Thread.currentThread().getName();
System.out.println(threadName + " : Started Task...");
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
System.out.println(threadName + " : "+ i);
sleep(1);
}
System.out.println(threadName + " : Completed Task");
latch.countDown(); // Decrements the count of the latch,
}
public void sleep(int sec) {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000 * sec);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
@也可以看看
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
115573 次 |
| 最近记录: |