Sae*_*ani 9 c# class object instance
我有这样的课
public class TestData
{
public string Name {get;set;}
public string type {get;set;}
public List<string> Members = new List<string>();
public void AddMembers(string[] members)
{
Members.AddRange(members);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想知道是否有可能直接与这个类的实例进行比较,并发现它们完全相同?机制是什么?我正在寻找类似的东西if(testData1 == testData2) //Do Something,如果没有,怎么办呢?
Fre*_*els 19
您应该IEquatable<T>在类上实现接口,这将允许您定义相等逻辑.实际上,您也应该覆盖该Equals方法.
public class TestData : IEquatable<TestData>
{
public string Name {get;set;}
public string type {get;set;}
public List<string> Members = new List<string>();
public void AddMembers(string[] members)
{
Members.AddRange(members);
}
// Overriding Equals member method, which will call the IEquatable implementation
// if appropriate.
public override bool Equals( Object obj )
{
var other = obj as TestData;
if( other == null ) return false;
return Equals (other);
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
// Provide own implementation
}
// This is the method that must be implemented to conform to the
// IEquatable contract
public bool Equals( TestData other )
{
if( other == null )
{
return false;
}
if( ReferenceEquals (this, other) )
{
return true;
}
// You can also use a specific StringComparer instead of EqualityComparer<string>
// Check out the specific implementations (StringComparer.CurrentCulture, e.a.).
if( EqualityComparer<string>.Default.Compare (Name, other.Name) == false )
{
return false;
}
...
// To compare the members array, you could perhaps use the
// [SequenceEquals][2] method. But, be aware that [] {"a", "b"} will not
// be considerd equal as [] {"b", "a"}
return true;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
一些引用类型的对象T可以通过三种方式相互比较:
object.Equals方法IEquatable<T>.Equals(仅适用于实现的类型IEquatable<T>)==此外,每种情况都有两种可能性:
T(或其他一些基础T)object您绝对需要知道的规则是:
Equals和operator==是测试引用相等Equals无论被比较的对象的静态类型是什么,实现都将正常工作IEquatable<T>.Equals应始终表现相同object.Equals,但如果对象的静态类型,T它将提供稍好的性能那么所有这些在实践中意味着什么呢?
根据经验,您应该使用Equals检查相等性(object.Equals必要时覆盖)并实现IEquatable<T>以提供稍微更好的性能.在这种情况下object.Equals应该实施IEquatable<T>.Equals.
对于某些特定类型(例如System.String),它也可以使用operator==,但您必须小心不要进行"多态比较".Equals另一方面,即使您进行了这样的比较,这些方法也能正常工作.
你可以看到多态性比较的例子,为什么它可以是一个问题在这里.
最后,永远不要忘记,如果你覆盖,object.Equals你也必须相应地覆盖object.GetHashCode.
一种实现方法是实施 IEquatable<T>
public class TestData : IEquatable<TestData>
{
public string Name {get;set;}
public string type {get;set;}
public List<string> Members = new List<string>();
public void AddMembers(string[] members)
{
Members.AddRange(members);
}
public bool Equals(TestData other)
{
if (this.Name != other.Name) return false;
if (this.type != other.type) return false;
// TODO: Compare Members and return false if not the same
return true;
}
}
if (testData1.Equals(testData2))
// classes are the same
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您还可以重写Equals(object)方法(来自System.Object),如果执行此操作,则还应该重写GetHashCode,请参见此处