perl和ruby之间的河豚加密的区别

Question

为什么Crypt :: CBC(perl)和OpenSSL(ruby)之间的blowfish加密存在差异？

Perl的

use Crypt::CBC;

my $cipher = Crypt::CBC->new( -key => 'length32length32length32length32', -cipher => 'Blowfish' );
my $ciphertext = $cipher->encrypt_hex('test');

# ciphertext is 53616c7465645f5f409c8b8eb353823c06d9b50537c92e19

红宝石

require "rubygems"
require "openssl"

cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher::Cipher.new("bf-cbc")
cipher.encrypt
cipher.key = "length32length32length32length32"

result = cipher.update("test") << cipher.final
ciphertext = result.unpack("H*").first

# ciphertext is 16f99115a09e0464

Crypt :: CBC Salted__默认情况下似乎在输出前面.你能解释一下这些之间发生了什么不同吗？有没有办法让OpenSSL以类似于Crypt :: CBC的方式运行？

Answer 1

Crypt :: CBC(perl)使用自己的方法随机化salt和初始化向量.另外,在Blowfish的情况下,它使用如上所述的密钥长度56.

使用示例中的perl代码:

Perl的

use Crypt::CBC;

my $cipher = Crypt::CBC->new( -key => 'length32length32length32length32', -cipher =>  'Blowfish' );
my $ciphertext = $cipher->encrypt_hex('test');
# 53616c7465645f5f409c8b8eb353823c06d9b50537c92e19

要使用ruby(OpenSSL)对此进行解码,需要进行一些调整以提取密钥和初始化向量:

红宝石

require 'openssl'

# Hex string to decode(from above)
string = '53616c7465645f5f409c8b8eb353823c06d9b50537c92e19'

# Pack Hex
string = [string].pack('H*')

# Some Config
pass = 'length32length32length32length32'
key_len = 56;
iv_len  = 8;
desired_len = key_len + iv_len;
salt_re = /^Salted__(.{8})/

#Extract salt
salt = salt_re.match(string)
salt = salt.captures[0]
data  = '';
d = '';
while (data.length < desired_len)
  d = Digest::MD5::digest("#{d}#{pass}#{salt}");
  data << d;
end

#Now you have extracted your key and initialization vector
key = data.slice(0..key_len-1)
iv = data.slice(key_len .. -1)

# Trim string of salt
string = string[16..-1]

cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher::Cipher.new "bf-cbc"
cipher.decrypt
cipher.key_len = key_len
cipher.key = key
cipher.iv = iv

puts cipher.update(string) << cipher.final
# test