从派生**转换为基础**

Nar*_*rek 13 c++ inheritance pointers c++-faq pointer-conversion

我正在读这篇文章,遗憾的是,我无法深入理解为什么编译器不允许从Derived**转换为Base**.此外,我已经看到这个没有提供比parashift.com的链接更多的信息.

编辑:

让我们逐行分析这个代码:

   Car   car;
   Car*  carPtr = &car;
   Car** carPtrPtr = &carPtr;
   //MyComment: Until now there is no problem!

   Vehicle** vehiclePtrPtr = carPtrPtr;  // This is an error in C++
   //MyComment: Here compiler gives me an error! And I try to understand why. 
   //MyComment: Let us consider that it was allowed. So what?? Let's go ahead!

   NuclearSubmarine  sub;
   NuclearSubmarine* subPtr = ⊂
   //MyComment: this two line are OK too!

   *vehiclePtrPtr = subPtr;

   //MyComment: the important part comes here... *vehiclePtrPtr is a pointer to
   //MyComment: a vehicle, particularly in our case it points to a Car object.
   //MyComment: Now when I assign to the pointer to the Car object *vehiclePtrPtr,
   //MyComment: a pointer to NuclearSubmarine, then it should just point to the
   //MyComment: NuclearSubmarine object as it is indeed a pointer to a Vehicle,
   //MyComment: isn't it? Where is my fault? Where I am wrong?

   // This last line would have caused carPtr to point to sub!
   carPtr->openGasCap();  // This might call fireNuclearMissle()!
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

fre*_*low 20

这与一碗香蕉不是一碗水果的原因基本相同.如果一碗香蕉一碗水果,你可以把一个苹果放入碗中,它将不再是一碗香蕉.

只要你只检查碗,转换是无害的.但是一旦你开始修改它,转换就变得不安全了.这是要牢记的关键点.(这就是为什么不可变的Scala集合实际允许转换的确切原因,但是可变集合禁止它.)

与你的例子相同.如果有一个转换Derived**Base**,你可以把一个指针指向一个苹果,类型系统承诺只有指向香蕉的指针可能存在.繁荣!

  • 那为什么我不能将 `Derived**` 转换为 `Base * const *` 呢?常量性会阻止我将派生指针指向不同的派生指针。 (2认同)

Dav*_*rtz 11

这样可以避免任何无意义的错误:

class Flutist : public Musician
...

class Pianist : public Musician
...

void VeryBad(Flutist **f, Pianist **p)
{
 Musician **m1=f;
 Musician **m2=p;
 *m1=*m2; // Oh no! **f is supposed to be a Flutist and it's a Pianist!
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这是一个完整的工作示例:

#include <stdio.h>

class Musician
{
 public:
 Musician(void) { ; }
 virtual void Play(void)=0;
};

class Pianist : public Musician
{
 public:
 Pianist(void) { ; }
 virtual void Play(void) { printf("The piano blares\n"); }
};

class Flutist : public Musician
{
 public:
 Flutist(void) { ; }
 virtual void Play(void) { printf("The flute sounds.\n"); }
};

void VeryBad(Flutist **f, Pianist **p)
{
 Musician **m1=f;
 Musician **m2=p;
 *m1=*m2; // Oh no! **f is supposed to be a Flutist and it's a Pianist!
}

int main(void)
{
 Flutist *f=new Flutist();
 Pianist *p=new Pianist();
 VeryBad(&f, &p);
 printf("Mom is asleep, but flute playing wont bother her.\n");
 f->Play(); // Since f is a Flutist* this can't possibly play piano, can it?
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

在这里,它正在行动:

$ g++ -fpermissive verybad.cpp -o verybad
verybad.cpp: In function void VeryBad(Flutist**, Pianist**):
verybad.cpp:26:20: warning: invalid conversion from Flutist** to Musician** [-fpermissive]
verybad.cpp:27:20: warning: invalid conversion from Pianist** to Musician** [-fpermissive]
$ ./verybad 
Mom is asleep, but flute playing wont bother her.
The piano blares
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)