Scala:匹配案例类

div*_*der 8 oop scala

以下代码声称杰克受雇于建筑业,但简是另一个粗暴经济的受害者:

abstract class Person(name: String) {

  case class Student(name: String, major: String) extends Person(name)

  override def toString(): String = this match {
    case Student(name, major) => name + " studies " + major
    case Worker(name, occupation) => name + " does " + occupation
    case _ => name + " is unemployed"
  }
}

case class Worker(name: String, job: String) extends Person(name)

object Narrator extends Person("Jake") {
  def main(args: Array[String]) {
    var friend: Person = new Student("Jane", "biology")
    println("My friend " + friend) //outputs "Jane is unemployed"
    friend = new Worker("Jack", "construction")
    println("My friend " + friend) //outputs "Jack does construction"
  }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

为什么比赛未能将Jane视为学生?

Emi*_*Sit 5

我认为这里发生的是Student案例类是在里面声明的Person.因此case Student,toString遗嘱中只会匹配Student特定Person实例的一部分.

如果你移动case class Student到平行于case class Worker(然后删除不必要extends Person("Jake")object Narrator......只有那里,以便new Student伤口Person$Student特定于杰克),你会发现简确实研究生物学.


Dan*_*ral 4

埃米尔是完全正确的,但这里有一个例子可以清楚地说明这一点:

scala> case class A(a: String) {
     |   case class B(b: String)
     |   def who(obj: Any) = obj match {
     |     case B(b) => println("I'm A("+a+").B("+b+").")
     |     case b: A#B => println("I'm B("+b+") from some A")
     |     case other => println("Who am I?")
     |   }
     | }
defined class A

scala> val a1 = A("a1")
a1: A = A(a1)

scala> val a2 = A("a2")
a2: A = A(a2)

scala> val b1= a1.B("b1")
b1: a1.B = B(b1)

scala> val b2 = a2.B("b2")
b2: a2.B = B(b2)

scala> a1 who b1
I'm A(a1).B(b1).

scala> a1 who b2
I'm B(B(b2)) from some A
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

更准确地说,这一行:

case Student(name, major) => name + " studies " + major
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

真正意思

case this.Student(name, major) => name + " studies " + major
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

不幸的是,虽然 Jane 是在 Jake 上实例化的,但this在 Jane 的例子中却指向 Jane 本人。