WatchService和SwingWorker:如何正确地做到这一点?

kle*_*tra 11 java swing nio swingworker watchservice

WatchService听起来像一个令人兴奋的想法...不幸的是,它似乎与教程/ api plus中警告的低水平并不真正适合Swing事件模型(或者我错过了一些明显的,非零概率

从教程中的 WatchDir 示例中获取代码(只是为了处理单个目录),我基本上结束了

  • 扩展SwingWorker
  • 在构造函数中执行注册工作
  • 把无限循环放在doInBackground中等待一个键
  • 通过key.pollEvents()检索时发布每个WatchEvent
  • 通过使用已删除/创建的文件作为newValue触发propertyChangeEvents来处理块

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public class FileWorker extends SwingWorker<Void, WatchEvent<Path>> {
    
        public static final String DELETED = "deletedFile";
        public static final String CREATED = "createdFile";
    
        private Path directory;
        private WatchService watcher;
    
        public FileWorker(File file) throws IOException {
            directory = file.toPath();
            watcher = FileSystems.getDefault().newWatchService();
            directory.register(watcher, ENTRY_CREATE, ENTRY_DELETE, ENTRY_MODIFY);
        }
    
        @Override
        protected Void doInBackground() throws Exception {
            for (;;) {
                // wait for key to be signalled
                WatchKey key;
                try {
                    key = watcher.take();
                } catch (InterruptedException x) {
                    return null;
                }
    
                for (WatchEvent<?> event : key.pollEvents()) {
                    WatchEvent.Kind<?> kind = event.kind();
                    // TBD - provide example of how OVERFLOW event is handled
                    if (kind == OVERFLOW) {
                        continue;
                    }
                    publish((WatchEvent<Path>) event);
                }
    
                // reset key return if directory no longer accessible
                boolean valid = key.reset();
                if (!valid) {
                    break;
                }
            }
            return null;
        }
    
        @Override
        protected void process(List<WatchEvent<Path>> chunks) {
            super.process(chunks);
            for (WatchEvent<Path> event : chunks) {
                WatchEvent.Kind<?> kind = event.kind();
                Path name = event.context();
                Path child = directory.resolve(name);
                File file = child.toFile();
                if (StandardWatchEventKinds.ENTRY_DELETE == kind) {
                    firePropertyChange(DELETED, null, file);
                } else if (StandardWatchEventKinds.ENTRY_CREATE == kind) {
                    firePropertyChange(CREATED, null, file);
                }
            }
        }
    
    }
    
    Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

基本的想法是使用代码幸福地不知道粘糊糊的细节:它监听属性的变化,并根据需要更新任意模型:

    String testDir = "D:\\scans\\library";
    File directory = new File(testDir);
    final DefaultListModel<File> model = new DefaultListModel<File>();
    for (File file : directory.listFiles()) {
        model.addElement(file);
    }
    final FileWorker worker = new FileWorker(directory);
    PropertyChangeListener l = new PropertyChangeListener() {

        @Override
        public void propertyChange(PropertyChangeEvent evt) {
            if (FileWorker.DELETED == evt.getPropertyName()) {
                model.removeElement(evt.getNewValue());
            } else if (FileWorker.CREATED == evt.getPropertyName()) {
                model.addElement((File) evt.getNewValue());
            }
        }
    };
    worker.addPropertyChangeListener(l);
    JXList list = new JXList(model);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

似乎工作,但我感到不舒服

  • 我自己作为线程不可知论自己:我到目前为止看到的所有示例片段都通过使用watcher.take()来阻止等待线程.他们为什么这样做?期望至少有一些人使用watcher.poll()并稍微睡一觉.
  • SwingWorker发布方法似乎不太适合:现在它没关系,因为我只看一个目录(不想太过于错误的方向:)当试图看几个目录时(如原始的WatchDir示例)有几个键和WatchEvent相对于其中之一.要解决该路径,我需要事件和密钥正在观看的目录 [A] - 但只能传递一个.但是,最有可能错误地分配逻辑

[A] 编辑(由@ trashgods的评论引发) - 它实际上不是我必须随事件传递的密钥,它是报告更改的目录.相应地改变了问题

仅供参考,这个问题被交叉发布到OTN摇摆论坛

附录

阅读WatchKey的api文档:

如果有多个线程从监视服务检索已发出信号的密钥,则应注意确保仅在处理完对象的事件后调用reset方法.

似乎暗示事件应该

  1. 在检索WatchKey的同一线程上处理
  2. 重置密钥后不应触摸

不完全确定,但结合(未来)要求递归观看目录(不止一个)决定遵循@Eels建议,有点 - 将很快发布我定居的代码

编辑 只是接受了我自己的答案 - 如果有人有合理的反对意见,将谦卑地回复

kle*_*tra 4

实际上,@Eels 的评论并没有停止敲击我的脑后 - 并最终注册:这是要走的路,但不需要任何“人工”结构,因为我们已经有了完美的候选者 - 它是 PropertyChangeEvent本身:-)

从我的问题中获取整体流程描述,前三个项目符号保持不变

  • 相同:扩展 SwingWorker
  • 相同:在构造函数中进行注册操作
  • 相同:将等待按键的无限循环放在 doInBackground 中
  • 更改:通过 key.pollEvents 检索时,从每个 WatchEvent 创建适当的 PropertyChangeEvent 并发布 PropertyChangeEvent
  • 更改:触发进程中先前创建的事件(块)

修改FileWorker

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public class FileWorker extends SwingWorker<Void, PropertyChangeEvent> {

    public static final String FILE_DELETED = StandardWatchEventKinds.ENTRY_DELETE.name();
    public static final String FILE_CREATED = StandardWatchEventKinds.ENTRY_CREATE.name();
    public static final String FILE_MODIFIED = StandardWatchEventKinds.ENTRY_MODIFY.name();

    // final version will keep a map of keys/directories (just as in the tutorial example) 
    private Path directory;
    private WatchService watcher;

    public FileWorker(File file) throws IOException {
        directory = file.toPath();
        watcher = FileSystems.getDefault().newWatchService();
        directory.register(watcher, ENTRY_CREATE, ENTRY_DELETE, ENTRY_MODIFY);
    }

    @Override
    protected Void doInBackground() throws Exception {
        for (;;) {
            // wait for key to be signalled
            WatchKey key;
            try {
                key = watcher.take();
            } catch (InterruptedException x) {
                return null;
            }

            for (WatchEvent<?> event : key.pollEvents()) {
                WatchEvent.Kind<?> kind = event.kind();
                // TBD - provide example of how OVERFLOW event is handled
                if (kind == OVERFLOW) {
                    continue;
                }
                publish(createChangeEvent((WatchEvent<Path>) event, key));
            }

            // reset key return if directory no longer accessible
            boolean valid = key.reset();
            if (!valid) {
                break;
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    /**
     * Creates and returns the change notification. This method is called from the 
     * worker thread while looping through the events as received from the Watchkey.
     * 
     * @param event
     * @param key
     */
    protected PropertyChangeEvent createChangeEvent(WatchEvent<Path> event, WatchKey key) {
        Path name = event.context();
        // real world will lookup the directory from the key/directory map
        Path child = directory.resolve(name);
        PropertyChangeEvent e = new PropertyChangeEvent(this, event.kind().name(), null, child.toFile());
        return e;
    }

    @Override
    protected void process(List<PropertyChangeEvent> chunks) {
        super.process(chunks);
        for (PropertyChangeEvent event : chunks) {
            getPropertyChangeSupport().firePropertyChange(event);
        }
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)