Sul*_*yev 5 python dataframe pandas rust-polars python-polars
我正在尝试polars并想了解为什么使用polars比pandas在特定示例上使用慢:
import pandas as pd
import polars as pl
n=10_000_000
df1 = pd.DataFrame(range(n), columns=['a'])
df2 = pd.DataFrame(range(n), columns=['b'])
df1p = pl.from_pandas(df1.reset_index())
df2p = pl.from_pandas(df2.reset_index())
# takes ~60 ms
df1.join(df2)
# takes ~950 ms
df1p.join(df2p, on='index')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
rit*_*e46 12
pandasjoin使用缓存的索引。
他们做同样的事情的比较:
# pandas
# CPU times: user 1.64 s, sys: 867 ms, total: 2.5 s
# Wall time: 2.52 s
df1.merge(df2, left_on="a", right_on="b")
# polars
# CPU times: user 5.59 s, sys: 199 ms, total: 5.79 s
# Wall time: 780 ms
df1p.join(df2p, left_on="a", right_on="b")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)