tre*_*der 93 python argument-unpacking python-3.x iterable-unpacking
考虑一下这些表达方式......请耐心等待...这是一个很长的清单......
(注意:重复一些表达式 - 这只是为了呈现"上下文")
a, b = 1, 2 # simple sequence assignment
a, b = ['green', 'blue'] # list asqignment
a, b = 'XY' # string assignment
a, b = range(1,5,2) # any iterable will do
# nested sequence assignment
(a,b), c = "XY", "Z" # a = 'X', b = 'Y', c = 'Z'
(a,b), c = "XYZ" # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
(a,b), c = "XY" # ERROR -- need more than 1 value to unpack
(a,b), c, = [1,2],'this' # a = '1', b = '2', c = 'this'
(a,b), (c,) = [1,2],'this' # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
# extended sequence unpacking
a, *b = 1,2,3,4,5 # a = 1, b = [2,3,4,5]
*a, b = 1,2,3,4,5 # a = [1,2,3,4], b = 5
a, *b, c = 1,2,3,4,5 # a = 1, b = [2,3,4], c = 5
a, *b = 'X' # a = 'X', b = []
*a, b = 'X' # a = [], b = 'X'
a, *b, c = "XY" # a = 'X', b = [], c = 'Y'
a, *b, c = "X...Y" # a = 'X', b = ['.','.','.'], c = 'Y'
a, b, *c = 1,2,3 # a = 1, b = 2, c = [3]
a, b, c, *d = 1,2,3 # a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, d = []
a, *b, c, *d = 1,2,3,4,5 # ERROR -- two starred expressions in assignment
(a,b), c = [1,2],'this' # a = '1', b = '2', c = 'this'
(a,b), *c = [1,2],'this' # a = '1', b = '2', c = ['this']
(a,b), c, *d = [1,2],'this' # a = '1', b = '2', c = 'this', d = []
(a,b), *c, d = [1,2],'this' # a = '1', b = '2', c = [], d = 'this'
(a,b), (c, *d) = [1,2],'this' # a = '1', b = '2', c = 't', d = ['h', 'i', 's']
*a = 1 # ERROR -- target must be in a list or tuple
*a = (1,2) # ERROR -- target must be in a list or tuple
*a, = (1,2) # a = [1,2]
*a, = 1 # ERROR -- 'int' object is not iterable
*a, = [1] # a = [1]
*a = [1] # ERROR -- target must be in a list or tuple
*a, = (1,) # a = [1]
*a, = (1) # ERROR -- 'int' object is not iterable
*a, b = [1] # a = [], b = 1
*a, b = (1,) # a = [], b = 1
(a,b),c = 1,2,3 # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
(a,b), *c = 1,2,3 # ERROR - 'int' object is not iterable
(a,b), *c = 'XY', 2, 3 # a = 'X', b = 'Y', c = [2,3]
# extended sequence unpacking -- NESTED
(a,b),c = 1,2,3 # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
*(a,b), c = 1,2,3 # a = 1, b = 2, c = 3
*(a,b) = 1,2 # ERROR -- target must be in a list or tuple
*(a,b), = 1,2 # a = 1, b = 2
*(a,b) = 'XY' # ERROR -- target must be in a list or tuple
*(a,b), = 'XY' # a = 'X', b = 'Y'
*(a, b) = 'this' # ERROR -- target must be in a list or tuple
*(a, b), = 'this' # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
*(a, *b), = 'this' # a = 't', b = ['h', 'i', 's']
*(a, *b), c = 'this' # a = 't', b = ['h', 'i'], c = 's'
*(a,*b), = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # a = 1, b = [2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
*(a,*b), *c = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # ERROR -- two starred expressions in assignment
*(a,*b), (*c,) = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # ERROR -- 'int' object is not iterable
*(a,*b), c = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # a = 1, b = [2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6], c = 7
*(a,*b), (*c,) = 1,2,3,4,5,'XY' # a = 1, b = [2, 3, 4, 5], c = ['X', 'Y']
*(a,*b), c, d = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # a = 1, b = [2, 3, 3, 4, 5], c = 6, d = 7
*(a,*b), (c, d) = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # ERROR -- 'int' object is not iterable
*(a,*b), (*c, d) = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # ERROR -- 'int' object is not iterable
*(a,*b), *(c, d) = 1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7 # ERROR -- two starred expressions in assignment
*(a,b), c = 'XY', 3 # ERROR -- need more than 1 value to unpack
*(*a,b), c = 'XY', 3 # a = [], b = 'XY', c = 3
(a,b), c = 'XY', 3 # a = 'X', b = 'Y', c = 3
*(a,b), c = 'XY', 3, 4 # a = 'XY', b = 3, c = 4
*(*a,b), c = 'XY', 3, 4 # a = ['XY'], b = 3, c = 4
(a,b), c = 'XY', 3, 4 # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你如何理解这种复杂性和混乱.在手动计算这些表达式的结果时,如何总是正确的.或者,在阅读别人的代码时,我应该忽略它们,而不是试图理解表达式实际上在做什么吗?
sen*_*rle 102
我对这篇文章的篇幅感到抱歉,但我决定选择完整性.
一旦你了解了一些基本规则,就不难概括它们.我会尽力用一些例子来解释.既然你正在谈论"手动"评估这些,我会建议一些简单的替换规则.基本上,如果所有迭代都以相同的方式格式化,您可能会发现理解表达式更容易.
仅出于解包的目的,以下替换在右侧有效=(即对于rvalues):
'XY' -> ('X', 'Y')
['X', 'Y'] -> ('X', 'Y')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果您发现某个值未解压缩,那么您将撤消替换.(有关详细说明,请参见下文.)
此外,当你看到"裸"逗号时,假装有一个顶级元组.这样做在左侧和右侧(即两个左值和右值):
'X', 'Y' -> ('X', 'Y')
a, b -> (a, b)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
考虑到这些简单的规则,这里有一些例子:
(a,b), c = "XY", "Z" # a = 'X', b = 'Y', c = 'Z'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
应用上述规则,我们转换"XY"为('X', 'Y')并覆盖parens中的裸逗号:
((a, b), c) = (('X', 'Y'), 'Z')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这里的视觉对应使得任务的工作方式非常明显.
这是一个错误的例子:
(a,b), c = "XYZ"
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
按照上述替换规则,我们得到以下内容:
((a, b), c) = ('X', 'Y', 'Z')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这显然是错误的; 嵌套结构不匹配.现在让我们看看它如何适用于一个稍微复杂的例子:
(a,b), c, = [1,2],'this' # a = '1', b = '2', c = 'this'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
应用上述规则,我们得到
((a, b), c) = ((1, 2), ('t', 'h', 'i', 's'))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但现在从结构中'this'可以清楚地看出,它不会被解压缩,而是直接分配给c.所以我们撤消替换.
((a, b), c) = ((1, 2), 'this')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在让我们看看当我们包含c一个元组时会发生什么:
(a,b), (c,) = [1,2],'this' # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
变
((a, b), (c,)) = ((1, 2), ('t', 'h', 'i', 's'))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
同样,错误是显而易见的.c不再是裸变量,而是序列中的变量,因此右侧的相应序列被解压缩(c,).但序列的长度不同,因此存在错误.
现在使用*运算符扩展解包.这有点复杂,但它仍然相当简单.前面的变量*变为一个列表,其中包含未分配给变量名的相应序列中的任何项.从一个相当简单的例子开始:
a, *b, c = "X...Y" # a = 'X', b = ['.','.','.'], c = 'Y'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这变成了
(a, *b, c) = ('X', '.', '.', '.', 'Y')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
分析这个的最简单方法是从最终开始工作.'X'分配给a并'Y'分配给c.序列中的其余值将放入列表中并分配给b.
Lvalues喜欢(*a, b)和(a, *b)只是上面的特例.*在一个左值序列中不能有两个运算符,因为它不明确.价值观将在何处进行(a, *b, *c, d)- 在b或c?我马上就会考虑嵌套的情况.
*a = 1 # ERROR -- target must be in a list or tuple
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这里的错误是相当不言自明的.target(*a)必须是元组.
*a, = (1,2) # a = [1,2]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是有效的,因为有一个裸露的逗号.应用规则......
(*a,) = (1, 2)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
由于除了以外没有其他变量*a,因此*a会使rvalue序列中的所有值都黯然失色.如果(1, 2)用一个值替换它会怎么样?
*a, = 1 # ERROR -- 'int' object is not iterable
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
变
(*a,) = 1
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
同样,这里的错误是不言自明的.你不能解压缩不是序列的*a东西,需要解压缩的东西.所以我们把它按顺序排列
*a, = [1] # a = [1]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
哪个是等价的
(*a,) = (1,)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
最后,这是一个常见的混淆点:(1)就像1- 你需要一个逗号来区分元组和算术语句.
*a, = (1) # ERROR -- 'int' object is not
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在进行嵌套.实际上这个例子不在你的"NESTED"部分; 也许你没有意识到它是嵌套的?
(a,b), *c = 'XY', 2, 3 # a = 'X', b = 'Y', c = [2,3]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
变
((a, b), *c) = (('X', 'Y'), 2, 3)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
顶级元组中的第一个值被赋值,顶层元组(2和3)中的剩余值被赋值c- 正如我们所期望的那样.
(a,b),c = 1,2,3 # ERROR -- too many values to unpack
*(a,b), c = 1,2,3 # a = 1, b = 2, c = 3
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我已经解释了为什么第一行会抛出错误.第二行是愚蠢的,但这就是为什么它的工作原理:
(*(a, b), c) = (1, 2, 3)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如前所述,我们从最终开始工作.3分配给c,然后将剩余的值分配给*前面的变量,在本例中(a, b).因此(a, b) = (1, 2),这恰好相同,因为有适当数量的元素.我想不出有任何理由会出现在工作代码中.同样的,
*(a, *b), c = 'this' # a = 't', b = ['h', 'i'], c = 's'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
变
(*(a, *b), c) = ('t', 'h', 'i', 's')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
从末尾开始工作,'s'分配给c并('t', 'h', 'i')分配给(a, *b).从两端再次合作,'t'被分配到a,并且('h', 'i')被分配给b为列表.这是另一个不应该出现在工作代码中的愚蠢示例.
我发现Python 2元组拆包非常简单.左侧的每个名称对应于整个序列或右侧序列中的单个项目.如果名称对应于任何序列的单个项目,则必须有足够的名称来涵盖所有项目.
然而,扩展拆包肯定会令人困惑,因为它非常强大.实际情况是你永远不应该做你给出的最后10个或更多有效的例子 - 如果数据是结构化的,它应该在一个dict或一个类实例中,而不是像列表这样的非结构化形式.
显然,新语法可能被滥用.你的问题的答案是,你不应该阅读这样的表达 - 他们是不好的做法,我怀疑他们会被使用.
仅仅因为你可以编写任意复杂的表达式并不意味着你应该这样做.你可以写代码,map(map, iterable_of_transformations, map(map, iterable_of_transformations, iterable_of_iterables_of_iterables))但不是.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
29990 次 |
| 最近记录: |