试试这个
var source = GetTheString();
var reversed = source.Reverse().Select(x => x.ToString()).Aggregate((x,y) => x + "." + y);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
编辑
这个解决方案绝对是针对"聪明"的目标.使用StringBuilder构建字符串可能会更高效.此解决方案创建许多中间字符串
EDIT2
关于"聪明"解决方案与StringBuilder方法的相对速度存在争议.我写了一个快速基准测量方法.正如所料,StringBuilder更快.
但是,速度差异是否显着在很大程度上取决于应用程序中实际使用的位置.
基准代码.
public static class AggregateUnchanged {
public static string Run(string input) {
return input
.Reverse()
.Select(x => x.ToString())
.Aggregate((x, y) => x + "." + y);
}
}
public static class WithStringBuilder {
public static string Run(string input) {
var builder = new StringBuilder();
foreach (var cur in input.Reverse()) {
builder.Append(cur);
builder.Append('.');
}
if (builder.Length > 0) {
builder.Length = builder.Length - 1;
}
return builder.ToString();
}
}
class Program {
public static void RunAndPrint(string name, List<string> inputs, Func<string, string> worker) {
// Test case. JIT the code and verify it actually works
var test = worker("123456");
if (test != "6.5.4.3.2.1") {
throw new InvalidOperationException("Bad algorithm");
}
var watch = new Stopwatch();
watch.Start();
foreach (var cur in inputs) {
var result = worker(cur);
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("{0} ({2} elements): {1}", name, watch.Elapsed, inputs.Count);
}
public static string NextInput(Random r) {
var len = r.Next(1, 1000);
var builder = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
builder.Append(r.Next(0, 9));
}
return builder.ToString();
}
public static void RunAll(List<string> input) {
RunAndPrint("Normal Aggregate", input, AggregateUnchanged.Run);
RunAndPrint("WithStringBuilder", input, WithStringBuilder.Run);
}
static void Main(string[] args) {
var random = new Random((int)DateTime.Now.Ticks);
RunAll(Enumerable.Range(0, 100).Select(_ => NextInput(random)).ToList());
RunAll(Enumerable.Range(0, 1000).Select(_ => NextInput(random)).ToList());
RunAll(Enumerable.Range(0, 10000).Select(_ => NextInput(random)).ToList());
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)