Aus*_*tin 2 c++ templates iterator overloading operator-keyword
我想在列表类中重载迭代器的"+"运算符,类似于
list<double>::iterator operator+(const list<double>::iterator& it, int n)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这很好用.但是,当我尝试将其实现为模板时,就像
template<class T>
typename list<T>::iterator operator+(const typename list<T>::iterator& it, int n)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我收到错误信息,如,
no match for 'operator+' in 'it + small_index'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
无法弄清楚原因......
代码附在下面,
#include<iostream>
#include<list>
using namespace std;
template<class T>
ostream& operator<< (ostream& os, const list<T>& l)
{
typename list<T>::const_iterator i = l.begin();
for (;i!=--l.end();i++)
os<<*i<<";";
os<<*i<<endl;
return os;
}
template<class T> //this is where it goes WRONG.
//If don't use template, delete "typename", T->double, runs well
typename list<T>::iterator operator+(const typename list<T>::iterator& it, int n)
{
typename list<double>::iterator temp=it;
for(int i=0; i<n; i++)
temp++;
return temp;
}
template <class T>
void small_sort(list<T>& l)
{
int n = l.size();
typename list<T>::iterator it = l.begin();
for(int i=0; i<n-1; i++)
{
//Find index of next smallest value
int small_index = i;
for(int j=i+1; j<n; j++)
{
if(*(it+j)<*(it+small_index)) small_index=j;
}
//Swap next smallest into place
double temp = *(it+i);
*(it+i) = *(it+small_index);
*(it+small_index)=temp;
}
}
int main()
{
list<double> l;
l.push_back(6);
l.push_back(1);
l.push_back(3);
l.push_back(2);
l.push_back(4);
l.push_back(5);
l.push_back(0);
cout<<"=============sort the list=============="<<endl;
small_sort(l);
cout<<l;
return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
问题是,在这种情况下,论证是不可推论的.
template<class T>
typename list<T>::iterator operator+(const typename list<T>::iterator& it, int n);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
当你在那里使用迭代器时,编译器必须生成list任何给定类型的所有可能的实例化,并尝试将内部类型iterator与你传递的参数匹配,注意一旦你添加,所有类型的集合实际上是无限的混合模板,因为您可以无限制地实例化同一模板的实例化模板.
我建议你完全避免这个问题,并使用std::advance哪种方法来推进迭代器.