如何实现抽象基类的构造函数?

Far*_* ET 2 python inheritance abstract-class abc python-3.x

我正在尝试编写一个基本抽象类,它具有一些将使用构造函数初始化的属性。到目前为止我有这个:

from abc import ABC, abstractmethod

class A(ABC):
    def __init__(self, n, *params):
        self.n = n
        self.initialize_params(*params) #I want to do this in all subsclasses of A
    def initialize_params(self, *params)
       pass
    @abstractmethod
    def do(self):
        pass

class B(A):
    def __init__(self, m, n, *super_params):
        self.m = m
        super(A, self).__init__(n, *super_params)
    def do(self):
        print("this is B")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

但这会TypeError因为__init__B 中 A 的实例化而抛出。正确的方法是什么?

qua*_*ana 5

您似乎有几个错误:

from abc import ABC, abstractmethod

class A(ABC):
    def __init__(self, n, *params):
        self.n = n
        self.initialize_params(*params) #I want to do this in all subsclasses of A
    def initialize_params(self, *params):
        pass
    @abstractmethod
    def do(self):
        pass

class B(A):
    def __init__(self, m, n, *super_params):
        self.m = m
        super().__init__(n, *super_params)  # correct way to use super() to call init
    def do(self):
        print("this is B")


b = B(1,2)
b.do()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

请注意,您错过了self.前面的内容initialize_params(),而且您似乎没有super()正确使用。

  • @FarhoodET **`super(supercls, self)`** 从来都不是你应该如何称呼“super”。它始终是 `super(the_class_where_its_being_known, self).foo()`,尽管在 Python 3 中,您可以只使用无参数形式,`super().foo()`,这将相当于正确的版本。 (4认同)