Chr*_*ris 5 java asynchronous timeout future
有两种方法可以强制 aCompletableFuture在给定时间后超时:
我希望他们也有同样的行为。然而,当应用于 时CompletableFuture.allOf(CompletableFuture<?>... cfs),这两种提供超时的方式表现得非常不同!
基本上,它似乎get()符合我的预期(它阻塞当前线程,直到所有 future 完成),而orTimeout()似乎行为非常奇怪(它在第一个 future 完成后尽快解锁当前线程)。
这是一些代码来演示我观察到的行为:
import org.junit.Test;
import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
public class AllOfWithTimeoutTest {
public static final int TIMEOUT_IN_MILLIS = 100;
@Test
public void allOfOrTimeout1() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
getAllOfFuture().get(TIMEOUT_IN_MILLIS, MILLISECONDS);
}
@Test
public void allOfOrTimeout2() throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
getAllOfFuture().orTimeout(TIMEOUT_IN_MILLIS, MILLISECONDS);
}
private CompletableFuture<Void> getAllOfFuture() {
return CompletableFuture.allOf(
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(1)),
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(2)),
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(3)),
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(4)),
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(5)),
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(6)),
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(7)),
CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> sleep(8))
);
}
public static void sleep(int millis) {
try {
Thread.sleep(millis);
System.out.format("Had a nap for %s milliseconds.\r\n", millis);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
};
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
打印输出allOfOrTimeout1()是我所期望的:
Had a nap for 1 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 2 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 3 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 4 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 5 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 6 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 7 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 8 milliseconds.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
的打印输出allOfOrTimeout2()不是我所期望的,并且每次执行时都会略有不同。它通常会打印前 2 行到第 5 行,但绝不会打印第 8 行。这是一个仅打印 2 行的版本:
Had a nap for 1 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 2 milliseconds.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
另外,如果我在 IntelliJ 中运行整个测试,我会在最后得到一些额外的行:
Had a nap for 1 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 2 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 3 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 4 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 5 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 6 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 7 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 8 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 1 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 2 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 3 milliseconds.
Had a nap for 4 milliseconds.
Process finished with exit code 0
Had a nap for
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我的问题是:
orTimeout()?| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1875 次 |
| 最近记录: |