the*_*tor 4 ruby memory ruby-on-rails microbenchmark
在优化我们的代码库时,我们尝试使用 bang 方法来减少有意义的对象分配,但我们在基准测试中观察到分配的对象数量减少但整体内存大小增加。
复制脚本:
# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'bundler/inline'
gemfile(true) do
source "https://rubygems.org"
git_source(:github) { |repo| "https://github.com/#{repo}.git" }
gem 'benchmark-memory', '0.1.2'
end
require 'benchmark/memory'
def with_bang(*methods)
methods.tap(&:flatten!)
end
def without_bang(*methods)
methods.flatten
end
Benchmark.memory do |x|
x.report("with_bang") { with_bang(:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o) }
x.report("without_bang") { without_bang(:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o) }
x.compare!
end
# Output
# Ruby version: ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x86_64-darwin19]
# INPUT: (:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o)
# Calculating -------------------------------------
# with_bang 160.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 1.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# without_bang 80.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 2.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# Comparison:
# without_bang: 80 allocated
# with_bang: 160 allocated - 2.00x more
# INPUT: (:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, [:f, :g], :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o)
# Calculating -------------------------------------
# with_bang 240.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 3.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# without_bang 480.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 3.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# Comparison:
# with_bang: 240 allocated
# without_bang: 480 allocated - 2.00x more
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在我的实验中,我相信这是由于 splat 运算符转换为数组。以下是暗示我得出这个结论的脚本。
# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'bundler/inline'
gemfile(true) do
source "https://rubygems.org"
git_source(:github) { |repo| "https://github.com/#{repo}.git" }
gem 'benchmark-memory', '0.1.2'
end
require 'benchmark/memory'
def with_splat(*methods)
methods.flatten!
end
def without_splat
methods = [:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, [:f, :g], :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o]
methods.flatten!
end
Benchmark.memory do |x|
x.report("with_splat") { with_splat(:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o) }
x.report("without_splat") { without_splat }
x.compare!
end
# Output
# Ruby version: ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x86_64-darwin19]
# INPUT: (:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o)
# Calculating -------------------------------------
# with_splat 160.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 1.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# without_splat 40.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 1.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# Comparison:
# without_splat: 40 allocated
# with_splat: 160 allocated - 4.00x more
# INPUT: (:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, [:f, :g], :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o)
# Calculating -------------------------------------
# with_splat 240.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 3.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# without_splat 240.000 memsize ( 0.000 retained)
# 3.000 objects ( 0.000 retained)
# 0.000 strings ( 0.000 retained)
# Comparison:
# with_splat: 240 allocated
# without_splat: 240 allocated - same
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我缺少什么来理解这种行为?为什么它会以这种方式行事?
谢谢!
编辑:我向包含嵌套数组的基准比较添加了新输入。有了新的输入,我们看到了与之前的基准测试不同的结果,我更困惑了!
让我们更仔细地检查这两个数组:
require 'objspace'
def with_splat(*methods)
ObjectSpace.dump(methods, output: open('with_splat.json', 'w'))
end
def without_splat(methods)
ObjectSpace.dump(methods, output: open('without_splat.json', 'w'))
end
with_splat(:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o)
without_splat([:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o])
ObjectSpace.dump_all(output: open('all_objects.json', 'w'))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
该脚本生成 3 个文件:
with_splat.json 包含有关 splatted 阵列的数据without_splat.json 包含有关非分割数组的数据all_objects.json 包含有关所有对象的数据(很多!)with_splat.json:(格式化)
require 'objspace'
def with_splat(*methods)
ObjectSpace.dump(methods, output: open('with_splat.json', 'w'))
end
def without_splat(methods)
ObjectSpace.dump(methods, output: open('without_splat.json', 'w'))
end
with_splat(:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o)
without_splat([:a, :b, :c, :d, :e, :f, :g, :h, :i, :j, :k, :l, :m, :n, :o])
ObjectSpace.dump_all(output: open('all_objects.json', 'w'))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
without_splat.json:(格式化)
{
"address": "0x7feb941289a0",
"type": "ARRAY",
"class": "0x7feb940972c0",
"length": 15,
"memsize": 160,
"flags": {
"wb_protected": true
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
正如您所看到的,后一个数组确实消耗了较少的内存(40 对 160),但它也有"shared": trueset 并且它引用了内存地址处的另一个对象0x7feb941328d8。
让我们all_objects.json通过jq找到该对象:
{
"address": "0x7feb941287e8",
"type": "ARRAY",
"class": "0x7feb940972c0",
"length": 15,
"shared": true,
"references": [
"0x7feb941328d8"
],
"memsize": 40,
"flags": {
"wb_protected": true
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
$ jq 'select(.address == "0x7feb941328d8")' all_objects.json
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这就是与上面第一个数组具有相同 memsize 的实际数组。
请注意,此数组已"frozen": true设置。我假设 Ruby 在遇到数组文字时会创建这些冻结数组。然后它可以在评估时创建便宜的(更)共享数组。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
87 次 |
| 最近记录: |