List<string> list = new List<string>() {"a", "b", "c"};
IEnumerable<string> enumerable = list;
int c1 = list.Count;
int c2 = list.Count();
int c3 = enumerable.Count();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
最后3个陈述之间在性能和实施方面是否存在差异?将list.Count()表现更差或相同list.Count,如果引用类型IEnumerable<string>是否重要?
Pao*_*tti 10
让我们看看Reflector:
public static int Count<TSource>(this IEnumerable<TSource> source)
{
if (source == null)
{
throw Error.ArgumentNull("source");
}
ICollection<TSource> is2 = source as ICollection<TSource>;
if (is2 != null)
{
return is2.Count;
}
ICollection is3 = source as ICollection;
if (is3 != null)
{
return is3.Count;
}
int num = 0;
using (IEnumerator<TSource> enumerator = source.GetEnumerator())
{
while (enumerator.MoveNext())
{
num++;
}
}
return num;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以,如果你的IEnumerable<T>工具ICollection<T>或者ICollection,它会返回Count属性.