Fra*_*ala 4 python keras tensorflow loss-function
我想在训练期间替换与我的神经网络相关的损失函数,这是网络:
model = tensorflow.keras.models.Sequential()
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.Conv2D(32, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation="relu", input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation="relu"))
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2)))
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.Dropout(0.25))
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.Flatten())
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(128, activation="relu"))
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.Dropout(0.5))
model.add(tensorflow.keras.layers.Dense(output_classes, activation="softmax"))
model.compile(loss=tensorflow.keras.losses.categorical_crossentropy, optimizer=tensorflow.keras.optimizers.Adam(0.001), metrics=['accuracy'])
history = model.fit(x_train, y_train, batch_size=128, epochs=5, validation_data=(x_test, y_test))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以现在我想换tensorflow.keras.losses.categorical_crossentropy
一个,所以我做了这个:
model.compile(loss=tensorflow.keras.losses.mse, optimizer=tensorflow.keras.optimizers.Adam(0.001), metrics=['accuracy'])
history = model.fit(x_improve, y_improve, epochs=1, validation_data=(x_test, y_test)) #FIXME bug during training
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但我有这个错误:
ValueError: No gradients provided for any variable: ['conv2d/kernel:0', 'conv2d/bias:0', 'conv2d_1/kernel:0', 'conv2d_1/bias:0', 'dense/kernel:0', 'dense/bias:0', 'dense_1/kernel:0', 'dense_1/bias:0'].
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为什么?我该如何解决?还有另一种改变损失函数的方法吗?
谢谢
我目前正在使用 Tensorflow 和 Keras 进行 google colab 工作,每次我重新编译这样的模型时,我都无法重新编译维护权重的模型:
with strategy.scope():
model = hd_unet_model(INPUT_SIZE)
model.compile(optimizer=Adam(lr=0.01),
loss=tf.keras.losses.MeanSquaredError() ,
metrics=[tf.keras.metrics.MeanSquaredError()])
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
权重被重置。所以我找到了另一个解决方案,你需要做的就是:
weights = model.get_weights()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
model.set_weights(weights)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我测试了这个方法,它似乎有效。
因此,要改变训练中的损失,您可以:
小智 5
所以,我给出的一个直接答案是:如果你想玩这类游戏,请切换到 pytorch。由于在 pytorch 中您定义了训练和评估函数,因此只需要一个 if 语句即可从损失函数切换到另一个损失函数。
另外,我在你的代码中看到你想从 cross_entropy 切换到 mean_square_error,前者适合分类,后者适合回归,所以这不是你能做的,在接下来的代码中我从均方误差切换到均方对数误差,都是适合回归的损失。
尽管其他答案为您的问题提供了解决方案(请参阅change-loss-function-dynamically-during-training),但您是否可以信任结果尚不清楚。有些人发现,即使使用自定义函数,有时 Keras 也会以第一个损失进行训练。
我的解决方案基于 train_on_batch,它允许我们在 for 循环中训练模型,因此只要我们更喜欢用新的损失函数重新编译模型,就停止训练它。请注意,重新编译模型不会重置权重(请参阅:重新编译模型是否重新初始化权重?)。
数据集可以在这里找到波士顿住房数据集
# Regression Example With Boston Dataset: Standardized and Larger
from pandas import read_csv
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from keras.losses import mean_squared_error, mean_squared_logarithmic_error
from matplotlib import pyplot
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# load dataset
dataframe = read_csv("housing.csv", delim_whitespace=True, header=None)
dataset = dataframe.values
# split into input (X) and output (Y) variables
X = dataset[:,0:13]
y = dataset[:,13]
trainX, testX, trainy, testy = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.33, random_state=42)
# create model
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(13, input_dim=13, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(6, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(1, kernel_initializer='normal'))
batch_size = 25
# have to define manually a dict to store all epochs scores
history = {}
history['history'] = {}
history['history']['loss'] = []
history['history']['mean_squared_error'] = []
history['history']['mean_squared_logarithmic_error'] = []
history['history']['val_loss'] = []
history['history']['val_mean_squared_error'] = []
history['history']['val_mean_squared_logarithmic_error'] = []
# first compiling with mse
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer='adam', metrics=[mean_squared_error, mean_squared_logarithmic_error])
# define number of iterations in training and test
train_iter = round(trainX.shape[0]/batch_size)
test_iter = round(testX.shape[0]/batch_size)
for epoch in range(2):
# train iterations
loss, mse, msle = 0, 0, 0
for i in range(train_iter):
start = i*batch_size
end = i*batch_size + batch_size
batchX = trainX[start:end,]
batchy = trainy[start:end,]
loss_, mse_, msle_ = model.train_on_batch(batchX,batchy)
loss += loss_
mse += mse_
msle += msle_
history['history']['loss'].append(loss/train_iter)
history['history']['mean_squared_error'].append(mse/train_iter)
history['history']['mean_squared_logarithmic_error'].append(msle/train_iter)
# test iterations
val_loss, val_mse, val_msle = 0, 0, 0
for i in range(test_iter):
start = i*batch_size
end = i*batch_size + batch_size
batchX = testX[start:end,]
batchy = testy[start:end,]
val_loss_, val_mse_, val_msle_ = model.test_on_batch(batchX,batchy)
val_loss += val_loss_
val_mse += val_mse_
val_msle += msle_
history['history']['val_loss'].append(val_loss/test_iter)
history['history']['val_mean_squared_error'].append(val_mse/test_iter)
history['history']['val_mean_squared_logarithmic_error'].append(val_msle/test_iter)
# recompiling the model with new loss
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_logarithmic_error', optimizer='adam', metrics=[mean_squared_error, mean_squared_logarithmic_error])
for epoch in range(2):
# train iterations
loss, mse, msle = 0, 0, 0
for i in range(train_iter):
start = i*batch_size
end = i*batch_size + batch_size
batchX = trainX[start:end,]
batchy = trainy[start:end,]
loss_, mse_, msle_ = model.train_on_batch(batchX,batchy)
loss += loss_
mse += mse_
msle += msle_
history['history']['loss'].append(loss/train_iter)
history['history']['mean_squared_error'].append(mse/train_iter)
history['history']['mean_squared_logarithmic_error'].append(msle/train_iter)
# test iterations
val_loss, val_mse, val_msle = 0, 0, 0
for i in range(test_iter):
start = i*batch_size
end = i*batch_size + batch_size
batchX = testX[start:end,]
batchy = testy[start:end,]
val_loss_, val_mse_, val_msle_ = model.test_on_batch(batchX,batchy)
val_loss += val_loss_
val_mse += val_mse_
val_msle += msle_
history['history']['val_loss'].append(val_loss/test_iter)
history['history']['val_mean_squared_error'].append(val_mse/test_iter)
history['history']['val_mean_squared_logarithmic_error'].append(val_msle/test_iter)
# Some plots to check what is going on
# loss function
pyplot.subplot(311)
pyplot.title('Loss')
pyplot.plot(history['history']['loss'], label='train')
pyplot.plot(history['history']['val_loss'], label='test')
pyplot.legend()
# Only mean squared error
pyplot.subplot(312)
pyplot.title('Mean Squared Error')
pyplot.plot(history['history']['mean_squared_error'], label='train')
pyplot.plot(history['history']['val_mean_squared_error'], label='test')
pyplot.legend()
# Only mean squared logarithmic error
pyplot.subplot(313)
pyplot.title('Mean Squared Logarithmic Error')
pyplot.plot(history['history']['mean_squared_logarithmic_error'], label='train')
pyplot.plot(history['history']['val_mean_squared_logarithmic_error'], label='test')
pyplot.legend()
plt.tight_layout()
pyplot.show()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
结果图确认损失函数在第二个时期后发生变化:
损失函数的下降是由于模型从正态均方误差切换到对数误差,后者的值要低得多。打印分数也证明使用的损失确实发生了变化:
print(history['history']['loss'])
[599.5209197998047, 570.4041115897043, 3.8622902120862688, 2.1578191178185597]
print(history['history']['mean_squared_error'])
[599.5209197998047, 570.4041115897043, 510.29034205845426, 425.32058388846264]
print(history['history']['mean_squared_logarithmic_error'])
[8.624503476279122, 6.346359729766846, 3.8622902120862688, 2.1578191178185597]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在前两个时期,损失的值等于 mean_square_error 的值,在第三和第四个时期,值变得等于 mean_square_logarithmic_error 的值,这是设置的新损失。因此,似乎使用 train_on_batch 允许更改损失函数,但我想再次强调,这基本上是在 pytoch 上应该做的以达到相同的结果,区别在于 pytorch 的行为(在这种情况下和我的意见)更可靠。