geg*_*geg 3 testing apache-camel kotlin apache-camel-3
在从 Camel 2 迁移到 3 的过程中,我的错误路由测试失败了。
我遵循的模式是强制异常并断言该onException()
块使用适当的标签发送到我的指标路由。
我正在使用 uri 模式匹配来单独测试每个标签的发出...这强烈影响测试模式
注意:在下面的两个示例中,createRouteBuilder()
方法是相同的
import org.apache.camel.RoutesBuilder
import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder
import org.apache.camel.test.junit4.CamelTestSupport
import org.junit.Test
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
class Camel2Test : CamelTestSupport() {
val startUri = "direct:start"
val baseMetricsUri = "micrometer:counter:errors"
// Want to use pattern to test each individual tag here
val fullMetricsUri = "$baseMetricsUri?tags=a=1,b=2"
override fun isUseAdviceWith(): Boolean {
return true
}
override fun createRouteBuilder(): RoutesBuilder {
return object : RouteBuilder() {
override fun configure() {
onException(Exception::class.java)
.to(fullMetricsUri)
from(startUri)
.routeId(startUri)
.throwException(Exception())
}
}
}
@Test
fun `metric with tag B is emitted`() {
val exchange = createExchangeWithBody("")
val mockEndpoint = getMockEndpoint("mock:test")
context.getRouteDefinition(startUri)
.adviceWith(context, object : RouteBuilder() {
override fun configure() {
interceptSendToEndpoint("$baseMetricsUri.*b.*2.*") // <-- PATTERN
.skipSendToOriginalEndpoint()
.to(mockEndpoint)
}
})
context.start()
mockEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(1)
template.send(startUri, exchange)
assertMockEndpointsSatisfied(2, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
import org.apache.camel.RoutesBuilder
import org.apache.camel.builder.AdviceWithRouteBuilder
import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder
import org.apache.camel.test.junit4.CamelTestSupport
import org.junit.Test
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
class Camel3Test : CamelTestSupport() {
val startUri = "direct:start"
val baseMetricsUri = "micrometer:counter:errors"
// Want to use pattern to test each individual tag here
val fullMetricsUri = "$baseMetricsUri?tags=a=1,b=2"
override fun isUseAdviceWith(): Boolean {
return true
}
override fun createRouteBuilder(): RoutesBuilder {
return object : RouteBuilder() {
override fun configure() {
onException(Exception::class.java)
.to(fullMetricsUri)
from(startUri)
.routeId(startUri)
.throwException(Exception())
}
}
}
@Test
fun `metric with tag B is emitted`() {
val exchange = createExchangeWithBody("")
val mockEndpoint = getMockEndpoint("mock:test")
AdviceWithRouteBuilder.adviceWith(context, startUri) { routeBuilder ->
routeBuilder.interceptSendToEndpoint("$baseMetricsUri.*b.*2.*") // <-- PATTERN
.skipSendToOriginalEndpoint()
.to(mockEndpoint)
}
context.start()
mockEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(1)
template.send(startUri, exchange)
assertMockEndpointsSatisfied(2, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
未mockEndpoint
接收交换,而是仍发送至指标端点。
在 Camel 3 中,如何使用模式拦截像在 Camel 2 中那样的路线?手动测试表明错误路由在产品中的行为符合预期,因此这似乎是一个测试配置问题。
mock:
直接在路由中使用。当我不需要模式匹配时,这种替代方法就有效
override fun isMockEndpointsAndSkip() = myUri
// ... in test
getMockEndpoint("mock:$myUri").expectedMessageCount(1)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)首先,非常感谢您提出了一个框架良好的问题以及正确的代码示例!模拟组件的手册提到了“模拟现有端点”功能的介绍,很可能这就是阻止您的原因。我不太确定Camel的哪个版本引入了这个功能。
无论如何,为了解决当前的限制,您可以使用自动模拟功能本身。您的测试方法可以如下更改以使其正常工作。
@Test
fun `exception is routed to error logging route`() {
val exchange = createExchangeWithBody("")
// Create new mock endpoint that will replace our error route
val mockEndpoint = getMockEndpoint("mock:$errorUri")
AdviceWithRouteBuilder.adviceWith(context, startUri) { routeBuilder ->
routeBuilder.mockEndpoints(errorUri)
routeBuilder.interceptSendToEndpoint(errorUri)
.skipSendToOriginalEndpoint()
.to(mockEndpoint)
}
context.start()
mockEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(1)
template.send(startUri, exchange)
assertMockEndpointsSatisfied()
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
对原始代码进行了两处更改。
mock:test
符合自动生成的模拟端点类型 ( mock:direct:errors
)routeBuilder.mockEndpoints(errorUri)
以便camel可以自动注入Mocks,对于如下所述的模式errorUri
除此之外,还可以替换下面的块
routeBuilder.mockEndpoints(errorUri)
routeBuilder.interceptSendToEndpoint(errorUri)
.skipSendToOriginalEndpoint()
.to(mockEndpoint)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用单衬routeBuilder.mockEndpointsAndSkip(errorUri)
,除非有特定的原因要使用,intercept
正如您在问题中提到的那样。
在不进行任何更改的情况下运行代码会清楚地显示RouteReifier
Mock 端点中的挂钩,mock://test
而不是direct:errors
. 此外,似乎也context
有一个适当的。endpointStrategy
这可能是一个错误。尽管有简单的替代方案,但也请考虑将其作为ASF Jira上的问题提出。
14:32:34.307 [main] INFO org.apache.camel.reifier.RouteReifier - Adviced route before/after as XML:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<route xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring" customId="true" id="direct:start">
<from uri="direct:start"/>
<onException>
<exception>java.lang.Exception</exception>
<to uri="direct:errors"/>
</onException>
<throwException/>
</route>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<route xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring" customId="true" id="direct:start">
<from uri="direct:start"/>
<onException>
<exception>java.lang.Exception</exception>
<to uri="direct:errors"/>
</onException>
<interceptSendToEndpoint skipSendToOriginalEndpoint="true" uri="direct:errors">
<to uri="mock://test"/>
</interceptSendToEndpoint>
<throwException/>
</route>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
import org.apache.camel.Exchange;
import org.apache.camel.RoutesBuilder;
import org.apache.camel.builder.AdviceWithRouteBuilder;
import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder;
import org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint;
import org.apache.camel.test.junit4.CamelTestSupport;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
public class Camel3RouteTest extends CamelTestSupport {
private static final String startUri = "direct:start";
private static final String errorUri = "direct:errors";
private static final String mockErrorURI = "mock:"+ errorUri;
private static final String ERROR_MESSAGE = "ERROR MESSAGE!";
@Override
protected RoutesBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
return new RouteBuilder() {
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
onException(Exception.class)
.to(errorUri);
from(errorUri)
.routeId(errorUri)
.log("error happened!");
from(startUri)
.routeId(startUri)
.throwException(new Exception(ERROR_MESSAGE));
}
};
}
@Test
public void testExecution() throws Exception {
AdviceWithRouteBuilder.adviceWith(context, startUri, adviceWithRouteBuilder -> {
//a.mockEndpointsAndSkip(errorUri);
adviceWithRouteBuilder.mockEndpoints(errorUri);
adviceWithRouteBuilder.interceptSendToEndpoint(errorUri).skipSendToOriginalEndpoint().to(mockErrorURI);
});
MockEndpoint mockEndpoint = getMockEndpoint(mockErrorURI);
mockEndpoint.setExpectedMessageCount(1);
context.start();
sendBody(startUri, "A Test message");
assertMockEndpointsSatisfied();
Assert.assertNotNull(mockEndpoint.getExchanges().get(0).getProperty(Exchange.EXCEPTION_CAUGHT));
Exception receivedException = (Exception) mockEndpoint.getExchanges().get(0).getProperty(Exchange.EXCEPTION_CAUGHT);
Assert.assertTrue(receivedException instanceof Exception);
Assert.assertEquals(receivedException.getMessage(), ERROR_MESSAGE);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)