一般财产缺点？

Question

我在我的项目中使用通用属性,但我不知道,使用它们是否有任何缺点,请告诉我一个场景,它们有一个缺点？我的部分代码如下.

public class GenericResult<T>
{
    public T Data { get; set; }
    public bool IsSuccess { get; set; }
    public string Message { get; set; }
}

public GenericResult<int> AddCategory(TCategory tCategory)
{
    GenericResult<int> result = new GenericResult<int>();

    //business logic validation,dont make sense,only example :)
    if (tCategory.Name.Lenght > 100)
    {
        result.IsSuccess = false;
        result.Message = "Category Name length is too long";
        result.Data = 0;
    }

    //handle .net runtime error//may be database is not aviable.
    try
    {
        result.Data = this.catalogRepository.AddCategory(tCategory);
        result.IsSuccess = true;
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        result.Data = 0;
        result.IsSuccess = false;
        result.Message = ex.Message;
    }
    return result;
}

public GenericResult<IEnumerable<TCategory>> GetCategoryHierarchy(TCategory parentCategory)
{
    GenericResult<IEnumerable<TCategory>> result = new GenericResult<IEnumerable<TCategory>>();
    try
    {
        IEnumerable<TCategory> allCategories = catalogRepository.GetAllCategories();
        result.Data = GetCategoryHierarchy(allCategories, parentCategory);
        result.IsSuccess = true;

    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        result.IsSuccess = false;
        result.Data = null;
        result.Message = ex.Message;
    }
    return result;
} 

Answer 1

如果您不想引发异常，但更愿意返回包含错误或值的结果，即MayBe在某些情况下没问题。但说实话，在这种情况下，我更愿意简单地抛出/传递异常。

我更喜欢返回一个不可变的结构，而MayBe不是像你一样返回一个可变的类。它与 非常相似Nullable<T>，只是它适用于引用类型并且可以存储错误。就像是：

public struct MayBe<T>
{
    private T value;
    private Exception error;

    public bool HasValue{get{return error==null;}}
    public T Value
    {
      if(error!=null)
        throw error;
      else
        return value;
    }

    public static MayBe<T> CreateError(Exception exception)
    {
      return new MayBe<T>(default(T),exception);
    }

    public static MayBe<T> CreateValue(T value)
    {
      return new MayBe<T>(value,null);
    }

    public static implicit operator MayBe<T>(T value)
    {
        return CreateValue(value);
    }

    public override string ToString()
    {
        if(HasValue)
            return "Value: "+Value.ToString();
        else
            return "Error: "+Error.GetType().Name+" "+Error.Message;
    }
}

你的代码变成

public MayBe<int> AddCategory(TCategory tCategory)
{
    try
    {
       return this.catalogRepository.AddCategory(tCategory);
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        return MayBe<int>.CreateError(ex);
    }

    return result;
}

public MayBe<IEnumerable<TCategory>> GetCategoryHierarchy(TCategory parentCategory)
{
    try
    {
        IEnumerable<TCategory> allCategories = catalogRepository.GetAllCategories();
        return allCategories;

    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        return MayBe<int>.CreateError(ex);
    }

    return result;
}

我在这个实现中看到的一个问题是异常并不是完全不可变的。MayBe<T>如果在多个线程上抛出相同的异常，则可能会导致问题。也许有人可以提出更好的实施方案。