分段错误(核心转储)错误

Kat*_*Kat 1 c hashtable segmentation-fault

我正在编写一个程序,它使用链接列表的Hashtable来计算单词的频率.程序会计算我输入的所有单词以及频率,但是在打印哈希表后,我会收到分段错误(核心转储)错误.当我对我的程序进行valgrind时,它表明我在三个不同的地方得到了大小为8的无效读取错误.我不知道如何修复它们.以下是三个不同的地方:

 void freeTable(HashTablePtr table) {
     int i;
     ListPtr list;

     if (table == NULL)
         return;

     for (i = 0; i < table->size; i++) {
         list = table->table[i];
         freeList(list);
     }

     free(table->table);
     free(table);
 }


 HashTablePtr createTable(int tableSize) {

     int i;
     HashTablePtr table = (HashTablePtr) malloc(sizeof(HashTablePtr));
     table->table = (ListPtr *) malloc(sizeof(ListPtr) * tableSize);
     table->size = tableSize;

     for (i = 0; i < table->size; i++) {
         table->table[i] = createList();
     }

     return table;
 }


 void printTable(HashTablePtr table) {

     ListPtr tempList;
     NodePtr tempNode;
     HashObjectPtr obj;
     int i;

     for (i = 1; i < table->size; i++) {
         tempList = table->table[i];
         if (tempList->size != 0) {
             tempNode = tempList->head;
             obj = tempNode->HashObject;
             printf("%s\n\n", toString(obj));
         }
     }
 }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我认为错误必须使用这些行:
tempList = table-> table [i];
table-> table [i] = createList();
但我不确定如何解决它.

编辑:

 typedef struct hashtable HashTable;
 typedef struct hashtable * HashTablePtr;

 struct hashtable {
     int size;
     ListPtr *table;
 };
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Valgrind错误:

上下文中的999个错误5:
== 73795 ==无效读取大小8
== 73795 ==在0x400B7D:printTable(HashTable.c:96)
== 73795 == by 0x400766:main(wf.c:16)
== 73795 ==地址0x4c34048在大小为8的块之后是0字节alloc'd
= 73795 ==在0x4A0515D:malloc(vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
== 73795 == by 0x400D05:createTable(HashTable.c:17 )
== 73795 == by 0x400753:main(wf.c:14)
== 73795 ==
== 73795 ==
== 73795 ==上下文中的1000个错误6:
== 73795 ==无效的大小读数8
== 73795 ==在0x400B2B:freeTable(HashTable.c:128)
== 73795 == by 0x40076E:main(wf.c:17)
== 73795 ==地址0x4c34048是一个大小为8的块后的0字节' d
== 73795 ==在0x4A0515D:malloc(vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
== 73795 == by 0x400D05:createTable(HashTable.c:17)
== 73795 == by 0x400753:main(wf.c:14)
= = 73795 ==
== 73795 ==
== 73795 ==上下文7中的1000错误:
== 73795 ==无效读取大小8
== 73795 ==在0x400D4C:createTable(HashTable.c:25)
== 73795 == by 0x400753:main(wf.c:14)
== 73795 ==地址0x4c34048是0字节后 块大小为8 alloc'd
== 73795 ==在0x4A0515D:malloc(vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
== 73795 == by 0x400D05:createTable(HashTable.c:17)
== 73795 == by 0x400753:main( wf.c:14)

 ListPtr createList() {
     ListPtr list;
     list = (ListPtr) malloc(sizeof(List));
     list->size = 0;
     list->head = NULL;
     list->tail = NULL;
     return list;
 }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

nos*_*nos 7

HashTablePtr table = (HashTablePtr) malloc(sizeof(HashTablePtr));几乎肯定是错的.你想为HashTable分配足够的存储空间,但似乎你只是为一个指向HashTable(你的HashTablePtr)的指针分配存储空间

如果你放弃了typedef'ing指针的习惯,而是按照以下形式分配方法,你将不会遇到这类问题:

HashTable *table = malloc(sizeof *table);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)