ArraySegment - 返回实际的段C#

Question

我一直在寻找返回段的方法,该段基本上由ArraySegment在偏移量和计数方面持有.虽然ArraySegment包含完整的原始数组,但它只是将其分隔,因为对该段的任何更改都会反映到原始数组中.问题或说ArraySegment的限制是它不会返回整个段本身,我必须遍历值.返回整个细分市场的最佳方法是什么？

 byte[] input = new byte[5]{1,2,3,4,5};
 ArraySegment<byte> delimited = new ArraySegment<byte>(input,0,2);
 byte[] segment = HERE I NEED SOMETHING THAT WILL RETURN THE SEGMENT i.e. [0,1,2]

最重要的一点,段不能是副本,而应该引用原始数组.如果对段进行了任何更改,则必须将它们反映在原始数组中.

任何提示都非常感谢,谢谢!

指派基准:在Thomas和digEmAll的一些答案之后

好吧,我对digEmAll和Thomas的代码进行了一些基准测试,令我惊讶的是代码速度非常快.正是我拼命寻找的东西.结果如下.

Construct             Size    Elements assigned    Iterations       Time
_______________________________________________________________________________

ArraySegmentWrapper   1500        1500              1000000       396.3 ms
Array.Copy            1500        1500              1000000       4389.04 ms

正如你可以看到的巨大差异,我很清楚我将使用ArraySegment的代码.以下是基准测试代码.请注意,这可能有点偏颇,因为人们会争论为什么"新"被放入循环中.我只是想重现我目前手头的情况尽可能地解决它而不需要移动大部分代码.这只是我的一天!

namespace ArraySegmentWrapped
{
    class Program
    {

        public static Stopwatch stopWatch = new Stopwatch();
        public static TimeSpan span = new TimeSpan();
        public static double totalTime = 0.0;
        public static int iterations = 1000000;

        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int size = 1500;
            int startIndex = 0;
            int endIndex = 1499;
            byte[] array1 = new byte[size];
            byte[] array2 = null;

            for (int index = startIndex; index < size; index++)
            {
                array1[index] = (byte)index;
            }

            ArraySegmentWrapper<byte> arraySeg;

            for (int index = 0; index < iterations; index++)
            {
                stopWatch.Start();
                arraySeg = new ArraySegmentWrapper<byte>(array1, startIndex, endIndex);            
                stopWatch.Stop();
                totalTime += stopWatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds;
            }

            Console.WriteLine("ArraySegment:{0:F6}", totalTime / iterations);
            stopWatch.Reset();
            totalTime = 0.0;

            for (int index = 0; index < iterations; index++)
            {
                stopWatch.Start();
                array2 = new byte[endIndex - startIndex + 1];
                Array.Copy(array1, startIndex, array2, 0, endIndex);
                stopWatch.Stop();
                totalTime += stopWatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds;
            }
            Console.WriteLine("Array.Copy:{0:F6}", totalTime / iterations);                        


        }
    }
// Code for ArraySegmentWrapper goes here    

}

ACCESS BENCHMARKS(更新) 因此,在Thomas指出基准测试之后,并表示与ArraySegment相比,访问简单数组会更快,他完全正确.但是由于digEmAll指出我应该在发布模式下进行测试(对于在调试模式下测试的旧错误而感到遗憾),我将代码与上面几乎相同(迭代减少了两个零 - 无法等待很长时间才能输出到来,对不起)和一些修改来访问相同数量的元素,以下是我得到的.

Construct             Size    Elements accessed    Iterations       Time
_______________________________________________________________________________

ArraySegmentWrapper   1500        1500              1000000       5268.3 ms
Array.Copy            1500        1500              1000000       4812.4 ms

结论是虽然assingment非常快,但是通过ArraySegments访问速度很慢.

Answer 1

从Thomas Levesque的建议开始,我已经构建了一个ArraySegmentWrapper<T>以这种方式使用的简单类:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    int[] arr = new int[10];
    for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++)
        arr[i] = i;

    // arr = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

    var segment = new ArraySegmentWrapper<int>(arr, 2, 7);
    segment[0] = -1;
    segment[6] = -1;
    // now arr = 0,1,-1,3,4,5,6,7,-1,9


    // this prints: -1,3,4,5,6,7,-1
    foreach (var el in segment)
        Console.WriteLine(el);
}

执行:

public class ArraySegmentWrapper<T> : IList<T>
{
    private readonly ArraySegment<T> segment;

    public ArraySegmentWrapper(ArraySegment<T> segment)
    {
        this.segment = segment;
    }

    public ArraySegmentWrapper(T[] array, int offset, int count)
        : this(new ArraySegment<T>(array, offset, count))
    {
    }

    public int IndexOf(T item)
    {
        for (int i = segment.Offset; i < segment.Offset + segment.Count; i++)
            if (Equals(segment.Array[i], item))
                return i;
        return -1;
    }

    public void Insert(int index, T item)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    public void RemoveAt(int index)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    public T this[int index]
    {
        get
        {
            if (index >= this.Count)
                throw new IndexOutOfRangeException();
            return this.segment.Array[index + this.segment.Offset];
        }
        set
        {
            if (index >= this.Count)
                throw new IndexOutOfRangeException();
            this.segment.Array[index + this.segment.Offset] = value;
        }
    }

    public void Add(T item)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    public void Clear()
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    public bool Contains(T item)
    {
        return this.IndexOf(item) != -1;
    }

    public void CopyTo(T[] array, int arrayIndex)
    {
        for (int i = segment.Offset; i < segment.Offset + segment.Count; i++)
        {
            array[arrayIndex] = segment.Array[i];
            arrayIndex++;
        }
    }

    public int Count
    {
        get { return this.segment.Count; }
    }

    public bool IsReadOnly
    {
        get { return false; }
    }

    public bool Remove(T item)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
    {
        for (int i = segment.Offset; i < segment.Offset + segment.Count; i++)
            yield return segment.Array[i];
    }

    System.Collections.IEnumerator System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
    {
        return GetEnumerator();
    }
}

编辑:

正如@JeppeStigNielsen在评论中指出的那样,自.NET 4.5 ArraySegment<T>实现以来IList<T>

Answer 2

我使用以下一组扩展方法来处理数组段:

    #region ArraySegment related methods

    public static ArraySegment<T> GetSegment<T>(this T[] array, int from, int count)
    {
        return new ArraySegment<T>(array, from, count);
    }

    public static ArraySegment<T> GetSegment<T>(this T[] array, int from)
    {
        return GetSegment(array, from, array.Length - from);
    }

    public static ArraySegment<T> GetSegment<T>(this T[] array)
    {
        return new ArraySegment<T>(array);
    }

    public static IEnumerable<T> AsEnumerable<T>(this ArraySegment<T> arraySegment)
    {
        return arraySegment.Array.Skip(arraySegment.Offset).Take(arraySegment.Count);
    }

    public static T[] ToArray<T>(this ArraySegment<T> arraySegment)
    {
        T[] array = new T[arraySegment.Count];
        Array.Copy(arraySegment.Array, arraySegment.Offset, array, 0, arraySegment.Count);
        return array;
    }

    #endregion

您可以按如下方式使用它们:

byte[] input = new byte[5]{1,2,3,4,5};
ArraySegment<byte> delimited = input.GetSegment(0, 2);
byte[] segment = delimited.ToArray();