data.table 中的“递归”自联接

Pav*_*ive 5 recursion join r self-join data.table

我有一个由 3 列组成的组件列表:产品、组件和使用的组件数量:

a <- structure(list(prodName = c("prod1", "prod1", "prod2", "prod3", 
"prod3", "int1", "int1", "int2", "int2"), component = c("a", 
"int1", "b", "b", "int2", "a", "b", "int1", "d"), qty = c(1L, 
2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L)), row.names = c(NA, -9L), class = c("data.table", 
"data.frame"))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
  prodName component qty
1    prod1         a   1
2    prod1      int1   2
3    prod2         b   3
4    prod3         b   4
5    prod3      int2   5
6     int1         a   6
7     int1         b   7
8     int2      int1   8
9     int2         d   9
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

名字开头的prod产品是最终产品,名字开头的产品int中间产品,字母开头的产品是原材料。

我需要只有原材料作为组件的最终产品的完整组件列表。也就是说,我想将任何转换int为原材料。

  • 中间产品可以由原材料和另一个中间产品组成,因此我提到了“递归”。
  • 我无法提前知道中间产品的嵌套/递归级别(本例中为 2 个级别,实际数据中超过 6 个)。

对于这个例子,我的预期结果是(我明确说明了结果数字的计算):

prodName  |component  |qty
prod1     |a          |1+2*6 = 13
prod1     |b          |0+2*7 = 14
prod2     |b          |3
prod3     |b          |4+5*8*7 = 284
prod3     |a          |0+5*8*6 = 240
prod3     |d          |0+5*9 = 45
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我做了什么:

我通过创建一个非常繁琐的连接序列来解决这个问题merge。虽然这种方法适用于玩具数据,但我不太可能将其应用于真实数据。

#load data.table
library(data.table)

# split the tables between products and different levels of intermediate
a1 <- a[prodName %like% "prod",]
b1 <- a[prodName %like% "int1",]
c1 <- a[prodName %like% "int2",]

# convert int2 to raw materials
d1 <- merge(c1, 
            b1, 
            by.x = "component", 
            by.y = "prodName", 
            all.x = TRUE)[
              is.na(component.y),
              component.y := component][
                is.na(qty.y),
                qty.y := 1][,
                                .(prodName, qty = qty.x*qty.y),
                                by = .(component = component.y)]

# Since int1 is already exploded into raw materials, rbind both tables:
d1 <- rbind(d1, b1)

# convert all final products into raw materials, except that the raw mats that go directly into the product won't appear:
e1 <- merge(a1, 
            d1, 
            by.x = "component", 
            by.y = "prodName", 
            all.x = TRUE)

# rbind the last calculated raw mats (those coming from intermediate products) with those coming _directly_ into the final product:
result <- rbind(e1[!is.na(qty.y), 
                   .(prodName, qty = qty.x * qty.y), 
                   by = .(component = component.y)], 
                e1[is.na(qty.y), 
                   .(prodName, component, qty = qty.x)])[, 
                                                         .(qty = sum(qty)), 
                                                         keyby = .(prodName, component)]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我知道我可以将数据拆分成表格并执行连接,直到每个中间产品都表示为仅由原材料组成,但如上所述,由于数据的大小和中间的递归级别,这将是最后的手段产品。

有没有更简单/更好的方法来进行这种递归连接?

Jor*_*hau 6

本质上,您的数据代表有向图中的加权边列表。下面的代码使用库直接计算从原始组件到最终产品的每个简单路径上的(产品)距离总和igraph

library(igraph)

## transform edgelist into graph
graph <- graph_from_edgelist(as.matrix(a[, c(2, 1)])) %>%
  set_edge_attr("weight", value = unlist(a[, 3]))

## combinations raw components -> final products
out <- expand.grid(prodname = c("prod1", "prod2", "prod3"), component = c("a", "b", "d"), stringsAsFactors = FALSE)

## calculate quantities
out$qty <- mapply(function(component, prodname) {

  ## all simple paths from component -> prodname
  all_paths <- all_simple_paths(graph, from = component, to = prodname)

  ## if simple paths exist, sum over product of weights for each path
  ifelse(length(all_paths) > 0,
         sum(sapply(all_paths, function(path) prod(E(graph, path = path)$weight))), 0)

}, out$component, out$prodname)

out
#>   prodname component qty
#> 1    prod1         a  13
#> 2    prod2         a   0
#> 3    prod3         a 240
#> 4    prod1         b  14
#> 5    prod2         b   3
#> 6    prod3         b 284
#> 7    prod1         d   0
#> 8    prod2         d   0
#> 9    prod3         d  45
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


Col*_*ole 3

这是我使用您的数据集的尝试。

它使用循环检查来查看该字段中while是否还有任何内容。循环始终需要具有相同的字段,因此无需为递归乘法器添加一列(即最后的 5*8*7),而是集成迭代乘法器。即5*8*7最后变成5*56。componentsprodName

library(data.table)

a[, qty_multiplier := 1]
b <- copy(a)

while (b[component %in% prodName, .N] > 0) {
  b <- b[a
         , on = .(prodName = component)
         , .(prodName = i.prodName
             , component = ifelse(is.na(x.component), i.component, x.component)
             , qty = i.qty
             , qty_multiplier = ifelse(is.na(x.qty), 1, x.qty * qty_multiplier)
         )
         ]
}

b[prodName %like% 'prod', .(qty = sum(qty * qty_multiplier)), by = .(prodName, component)] 

   prodName component qty
1:    prod1         a  13
2:    prod1         b  14
3:    prod2         b   3
4:    prod3         b 284
5:    prod3         a 240
6:    prod3         d  45
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)