Den*_*ash 5 c++ template-meta-programming
我有Conditional模板
template<bool C, typename ...>
struct Conditional {
};
template<typename C1, typename C2>
struct Conditional<true, C1, C2> {
typedef C1 value;
};
template<typename C1, typename C2>
struct Conditional<false, C1, C2> {
typedef C2 value;
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
似乎按预期工作:
<Conditional<(0 != 1), Int<0>, Int<1>>::value; // Int<0>
<Conditional<(0 == 1), Int<0>, Int<1>>::value, // Int<1>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是它会在返回之前评估所有值:
template<typename G, typename M>
struct DoMove {
private:
constexpr static bool _isRLMove = (M::direction == Direction::LEFT || M::direction == Direction::RIGHT);
public:
using result = typename Conditional<
_isRLMove, typename DoMoveRL<G, M>::result, typename DoMoveUD<G, M>::result>::value;
// ^ when _isRLMove == false evaluates this
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这会导致来自的编译错误DoMoveRL。
如何根据情况进行评估?我在这里想念什么?
DoMoveRL<G, M>::result强制实例化DoMoveRL<G, M>。
您可能会延迟检索,result以避免强制实例化:
template<typename G, typename M>
struct DoMove {
private:
constexpr static bool _isRLMove = (M::direction == Direction::LEFT
|| M::direction == Direction::RIGHT);
public:
using result = typename Conditional<
_isRLMove, DoMoveRL<G, M>, DoMoveUD<G, M>>::value::result;
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
116 次 |
| 最近记录: |