Postgres 不使用日期字段索引

Moh*_*s A 6 postgresql b-tree-index

我创建了类似的索引

CREATE INDEX bill_open_date_idx ON bill USING btree(date(open_date));
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

和,

Column      |            Type
open_date   | timestamp without time zone
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

并解释分析如下

情况1

explain analyze select * from bill where open_date >=date('2018-01-01');
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
CREATE INDEX bill_open_date_idx ON bill USING btree(date(open_date));
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

案例2

explain analyze select * from bill where open_date>='2018-01-01';
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Column      |            Type
open_date   | timestamp without time zone
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

案例3

explain analyze select * from bill where date(open_date) >='2018-01-01';
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
explain analyze select * from bill where open_date >=date('2018-01-01');
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我对为什么会发生这种情况做了足够的研究,但在任何地方都没有适当的解释。只有情况 3使用了我创建的索引,其他情况则不然。为什么会发生这种情况?

据我的理解,情况 2搜索该列的等效字符串open_date,因此它没有使用索引。但为什么不是情况1。另外,如果我错了,请纠正我。

提前致谢!

编辑 1:另外,我很高兴知道到底发生了什么。

以下是要点摘录(https://gist.github.com/cobusc/5875282

奇怪的是,PostgreSQL 将用于创建索引的函数重写为规范形式,但在 WHERE 子句中使用该函数时(为了匹配索引函数),似乎并没有这样做。

不过,我不清楚为什么 postgres 的开发人员没有想到获取任何附近的匹配索引(或者在我显式转换为date情况3之前我的索引是无用的)。考虑到 Postgres 是高度发展和可扩展的。

Lau*_*lbe 4

B 树索引只能用于搜索条件,如果条件如下所示:

<indexed expression> <operator> <expression that is constant during the index scan>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
  • 必须<indexed expression>是您在语句中使用的表达式CREATE INDEX

  • 必须<operator>属于数据类型和索引访问方法的默认运算符类,或者属于 中指定的运算符类CREATE INDEX

  • 可以<expression that is constant during the index scan>是常量,也可以包含IMMUTABLE函数STABLE和运算符,但不能包含任何内容VOLATILE

您的所有查询都满足最后两个条件,但只有第三个查询满足第一个条件。这就是为什么只有该查询才能使用索引。

有关详细介绍这一点的文档,请参阅match_clause_to_indexcol以下内容的评论postgresql/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c

/*
 * match_clause_to_indexcol()
 *    Determine whether a restriction clause matches a column of an index,
 *    and if so, build an IndexClause node describing the details.
 *
 *    To match an index normally, an operator clause:
 *
 *    (1)  must be in the form (indexkey op const) or (const op indexkey);
 *         and
 *    (2)  must contain an operator which is in the index's operator family
 *         for this column; and
 *    (3)  must match the collation of the index, if collation is relevant.
 *
 *    Our definition of "const" is exceedingly liberal: we allow anything that
 *    doesn't involve a volatile function or a Var of the index's relation.
 *    In particular, Vars belonging to other relations of the query are
 *    accepted here, since a clause of that form can be used in a
 *    parameterized indexscan.  It's the responsibility of higher code levels
 *    to manage restriction and join clauses appropriately.
 *
 *    Note: we do need to check for Vars of the index's relation on the
 *    "const" side of the clause, since clauses like (a.f1 OP (b.f2 OP a.f3))
 *    are not processable by a parameterized indexscan on a.f1, whereas
 *    something like (a.f1 OP (b.f2 OP c.f3)) is.
 *
 *    Presently, the executor can only deal with indexquals that have the
 *    indexkey on the left, so we can only use clauses that have the indexkey
 *    on the right if we can commute the clause to put the key on the left.
 *    We handle that by generating an IndexClause with the correctly-commuted
 *    opclause as a derived indexqual.
 *
 *    If the index has a collation, the clause must have the same collation.
 *    For collation-less indexes, we assume it doesn't matter; this is
 *    necessary for cases like "hstore ? text", wherein hstore's operators
 *    don't care about collation but the clause will get marked with a
 *    collation anyway because of the text argument.  (This logic is
 *    embodied in the macro IndexCollMatchesExprColl.)
 *
 *    It is also possible to match RowCompareExpr clauses to indexes (but
 *    currently, only btree indexes handle this).
 *
 *    It is also possible to match ScalarArrayOpExpr clauses to indexes, when
 *    the clause is of the form "indexkey op ANY (arrayconst)".
 *
 *    For boolean indexes, it is also possible to match the clause directly
 *    to the indexkey; or perhaps the clause is (NOT indexkey).
 *
 *    And, last but not least, some operators and functions can be processed
 *    to derive (typically lossy) indexquals from a clause that isn't in
 *    itself indexable.  If we see that any operand of an OpExpr or FuncExpr
 *    matches the index key, and the function has a planner support function
 *    attached to it, we'll invoke the support function to see if such an
 *    indexqual can be built.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • 请记住,索引是排序列表,并且使用的顺序是相关的。不保证“date(open_date)”的排序方式与“open_date”相同。因此 `date(open_date) &gt;= '2018-01-01'::date` 并不意味着 `open_date &gt;=date('2018-01-01')`。因此,从原始索引上的索引扫描获得的结果不需要是该条件的正确结果。如果您碰巧自始至终都使用 ISO 日期,那么它会“意外地”工作,但 PostgreSQL 无法知道这一点。 (2认同)