Und*_*Emo 5 c# testing fluent moq chain
我正在使用 Daniel Cazzulino 的 moq 框架,kzu 版本 4.10.1。我想要最小起订量,以便我可以测试功能的特定部分(以下是我可以提取的代码的简单版本)
fluent/chain 方法的设计使您可以通过 Id 获取对象,并在需要时包含任何其他信息。
当函数调用 moq'ed 方法时,我在获取正确的对象时遇到了一些麻烦,该方法当前正在返回最后一个错误的 moq'ed 对象
/*My current Moq setup*/
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var mock = new Mock<IFluent>();
var c1 = new ClassA() { Id = 1, Records = new List<int>() { 5, 2, 1, 10 }, MetaData = new List<string>() };
var c2 = new ClassA() { Id = 2, Records = new List<int>(), MetaData = new List<string>() { "X", "Y", "Z" } };
mock.Setup(x => x.GetById(1).IncludeRecords().IncludeMetaData().Get()).Returns (c1);
mock.Setup(x => x.GetById(2).IncludeRecords().IncludeMetaData().Get()).Returns(c2);
var result = new ComputeClass().ComputeStuff(mock.Object);
Console.WriteLine(result);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
/*Fluent interface and object returned*/
public interface IFluent
{
IFluent GetById(int id);
IFluent IncludeRecords();
IFluent IncludeMetaData();
ClassA Get();
}
public class ClassA
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public ICollection<int> Records { get; set; }
public ICollection<string> MetaData { get; set; }
}
/*the method which is doing the work*/
public class ComputeClass
{
public string ComputeStuff(IFluent fluent)
{
var ids = new List<int>() { 1, 2 };
var result = new StringBuilder();
foreach (var id in ids)
{
var resClass = fluent.GetById(id).IncludeRecords().IncludeMetaData().Get();
result.Append($"Id : {id}, Records: {resClass.Records.Count}, MetaData: {resClass.MetaData.Count}{Environment.NewLine}");
}
return result.ToString();
}
}
Current incorrect result
/*Id : 1, Records: 0, MetaData: 3
Id : 2, Records: 0, MetaData: 3*/
Expected Result
/*Id : 1, Records: 3, MetaData: 0
Id : 2, Records: 0, MetaData: 3*/
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
最简单的方法是拆分每个设置:
var mock = new Mock<IFluent>();
var mock1 = new Mock<IFluent>();
var mock2 = new Mock<IFluent>();
mock.Setup(x => x.GetById(1)).Returns(mock1.Object);
mock1.Setup(x => x.IncludeRecords()).Returns(mock1.Object);
mock1.Setup(x => x.IncludeMetaData()).Returns(mock1.Object);
mock1.Setup(x => x.Get()).Returns(c1);
mock.Setup(x => x.GetById(2)).Returns(mock2.Object);
mock2.Setup(x => x.IncludeRecords()).Returns(mock2.Object);
mock2.Setup(x => x.IncludeMetaData()).Returns(mock2.Object);
mock2.Setup(x => x.Get()).Returns(c2);
var result = new ComputeClass().ComputeStuff(mock.Object);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果您想要更复杂的东西,您可以创建一个扩展/实用程序来为您处理这一切,请查看此博客文章:https : //www.codemunki.es/2014/11/20/mocking-a-流畅的界面自动在最小起订量/
只是对现有答案的补充。对于嘲讽流利的API有内一个有用的选项moq,它是SetReturnsDefault,它可以节省一些嘲讽,特别是如果你有巨大的流畅API,如
var mock = new Mock<IFluent>();
var mock1 = new Mock<IFluent>();
var mock2 = new Mock<IFluent>();
mock.Setup(x => x.GetById(1)).Returns(mock1.Object);
mock1.SetReturnsDefault(mock1.Object);
mock1.Setup(x => x.Get()).Returns(a);
mock.Setup(x => x.GetById(2)).Returns(mock2.Object);
mock2.SetReturnsDefault(mock2.Object);
mock2.Setup(x => x.Get()).Returns(b);
var aa = mock.Object.IncludeMetaData().GetById(1).IncludeMetaData().Get();
var bb = mock.Object.IncludeMetaData.GetById(2).IncludeMetaData.Get();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用这种方法,您实际上只需要模拟不同的方法,而不是来自 fluent API 的所有方法。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1255 次 |
| 最近记录: |