private boolean hasDuplicates(Recipe recipe) {
List<Recipe> currentRecipes = new ArrayList<>();
Stream.of(this.breakfast, this.lunch, this.dinner).forEach(meal -> {
currentRecipes.add(meal.getRecipe());
currentRecipes.add(meal.getSnack());
});
currentRecipes.add(this.snack);
return currentRecipes.contains(recipe);
};
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
// 想象一下所有字段的 getter 和 setter。
public class Menuplan {
private Meal breakfast;
private Meal lunch;
private Meal dinner;
private Recipe snack;
}
public class Meal {
private Recipe recipe;
private Reicpe snack;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果 Menuplan 已经分配了给定的食谱(作为零食或食谱),我使用上述方法进行测试。
我想知道是否有更优雅/更短的方法来编写函数。
在一个流中完成所有操作的解决方案是
private boolean hasDuplicates(Recipe recipe) {
return Stream.concat(
Stream.of(this.breakfast, this.lunch, this.dinner)
.flatMap(meal -> Stream.of(meal.getRecipe(), meal.getSnack())),
Stream.of(this.snack))
.anyMatch(Predicate.isEqual(recipe));
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
三个流元素this.breakfast, this.lunch, this.dinner得到相同的调用处理meal.getRecipe()并meal.getSnack()形成一个新流,该流与仅持有 的单个元素流连接this.snack。
anyMatchtrue一旦找到满足条件的元素,就会返回。否则,它将返回false。
您可以考虑将不符合其他元素通用模式的一个元素移出 Stream 操作:
private boolean hasDuplicates(Recipe recipe) {
return this.snack.equals(recipe) ||
Stream.of(this.breakfast, this.lunch, this.dinner)
.flatMap(meal -> Stream.of(meal.getRecipe(), meal.getSnack())
.anyMatch(Predicate.isEqual(recipe));
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
另一种选择是
private boolean hasDuplicates(Recipe recipe) {
return this.snack.equals(recipe) ||
Stream.of(this.breakfast, this.lunch, this.dinner)
.anyMatch(meal -> meal.getRecipe().equals(recipe)
|| meal.getSnack().equals(recipe));
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
110 次 |
| 最近记录: |