Meg*_*ers 1 scala filter pattern-matching fold
我正在编写一个Scala函数,它返回列表中偶数元素的总和,减去列表中奇数元素的总和.我不能为我的解决方案使用mutable,递归或for/while循环.下面的代码通过2/3测试,但我似乎无法弄清楚为什么它无法正确计算最后一个测试.
def sumOfEvenMinusOdd(l: List[Int]) : Int = {
if (l.length == 0) return 0
val evens = l.filter(_%2==0)
val odds = l.filter(_%2==1)
val evenSum = evens.foldLeft(0)(_+_)
val oddSum = odds.foldLeft(0)(_+_)
evenSum-oddSum
}
//BEGIN TESTS
val i1 = sumOfEvenMinusOdd(List(1,3,5,4,5,2,1,0)) //answer: -9
val i2 = sumOfEvenMinusOdd(List(2,4,5,6,7,8,10)) //answer: 18
val i3 = sumOfEvenMinusOdd(List(109, 19, 12, 1, -5, -120, -15, 30,-33,-13, 12, 19, 3, 18, 1, -1)) //answer -133
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我的代码正在输出:
defined function sumOfEvenMinusOdd
i1: Int = -9
i2: Int = 18
i3: Int = -200
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我非常困惑为什么这些负数会使我的其余代码绊倒.我看到一篇文章解释了foldLeft foldRight的操作顺序,但即使改为foldRight仍然会产生i3:Int = -200.有没有我遗漏的细节?任何指导/帮助将不胜感激.
问题不是foldLeft或者foldRight,问题是你过滤掉奇数值的方式:
val odds = l.filter(_ % 2 == 1)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
应该:
val odds = l.filter(_ % 2 != 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
谓词_ % 2 == 1只会对正元素产生真实.例如,表达式-15 % 2等于-1,而不是1.
如旁注,我们也可以使这更有效:
def sumOfEvenMinusOdd(l: List[Int]): Int = {
val (evenSum, oddSum) = l.foldLeft((0, 0)) {
case ((even, odd), element) =>
if (element % 2 == 0) (even + element, odd) else (even, odd + element)
}
evenSum - oddSum
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
或者仅通过累积差异来更好:
def sumOfEvenMinusOdd(l: List[Int]): Int = {
l.foldLeft(0) {
case (diff, element) =>
diff + element * (if (element % 2 == 0) 1 else -1)
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
227 次 |
| 最近记录: |