Aar*_*egh 6 ruby ruby-on-rails range date-range
我有这段代码:
date_counter = Time.mktime(2011,01,01,00,00,00,"+05:00")
@weeks = Array.new
(date_counter..Time.now).step(1.week) do |week|
logger.debug "WEEK: " + week.inspect
@weeks << week
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
从技术上讲,代码有效,输出:
Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 -0500 2011
Sat Jan 08 00:00:00 -0500 2011
Sat Jan 15 00:00:00 -0500 2011
etc.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但执行时间完全是垃圾!每周计算大约需要4秒钟.
我在这段代码中遗漏了一些奇怪的低效率吗?看起来很简单.
我正在使用Rails 3.0.3运行Ruby 1.8.7.
假设MRI和Rubinius使用类似的方法生成范围,所有无关检查使用的基本算法和一些Fixnum优化等被删除是:
class Range
def each(&block)
current = @first
while current < @last
yield current
current = current.succ
end
end
def step(step_size, &block)
counter = 0
each do |o|
yield o if counter % step_size = 0
counter += 1
end
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(参见Rubinius源代码)
对于一个Time
对象,#succ
返回一秒钟后的时间.因此,即使你每周都要求它,但无论如何它必须在两次之间逐步完成.
构建一系列Fixnum,因为它们具有优化的Range#step
实现.就像是:
date_counter = Time.mktime(2011,01,01,00,00,00,"+05:00")
@weeks = Array.new
(date_counter.to_i..Time.now.to_i).step(1.week).map do |time|
Time.at(time)
end.each do |week|
logger.debug "WEEK: " + week.inspect
@weeks << week
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
归档时间: |
|
查看次数: |
2704 次 |
最近记录: |