fya*_*est 3 sql postgresql common-table-expression
我正在学习如何使用 SQL CTE,我想比较两个查询以获得相同的答案(使用 postgresql),但我失败了,有人可以帮忙吗?
我创建了这个查询,并获得了每部电影标题的总数(Sakila 数据库):
SELECT COUNT(r.rental_id) rental_count,
f.title as "Film"
FROM film f
JOIN inventory i
ON f.film_id = i.film_id
JOIN rental r USING (inventory_id)
GROUP BY f.title
ORDER BY rental_count DESC;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想使用WITH(CTE)做同样的事情,为此我创建了以下代码:
WITH table1 AS (
SELECT f.film_id,
f.title as "Film"
FROM film f),
table2 AS (
SELECT r.inventory_id,
COUNT(r.rental_id) rental_count,
i.film_id,
i.inventory_id
FROM inventory i
JOIN rental r USING (inventory_id)
GROUP BY r.inventory_id, i.film_id, i.inventory_id)
SELECT *
FROM table1
JOIN table2
ON table1.film_id = table2.film_id;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
问题在于,结果没有显示每部电影标题的总数,而是单独显示每部电影标题。
第二个 CTE 需要按薄膜分组才能产生等效的最终结果。
WITH table1 AS (
SELECT
f.film_id
, f.title AS "Film"
FROM film f
)
, table2 AS (
SELECT
COUNT(r.rental_id) rental_count
, i.film_id
FROM inventory i
JOIN rental r ON i.inventory_id = r.inventory
GROUP BY i.film_id
)
SELECT
table2.rental_count
, table1.Film
FROM table1
JOIN table2 ON table1.film_id = table2.film_id
ORDER BY rental_count DESC;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
只是一个注释;我不建议在单个查询中同时使用自然和非自然连接类型,这可能会变得非常混乱。
SELECT
COUNT(r.rental_id) rental_count
, f.title AS "Film"
FROM film f
JOIN inventory i ON f.film_id = i.film_id
JOIN rental r ON i.inventory_id = r.inventory_id -- change here
GROUP BY f.title
ORDER BY rental_count DESC;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)