Jon*_*nny 8 python grammar cpython python-2.7 python-3.x
我正在研究一下Python的源代码,我决定将语法中的一些变化付诸实践,所以我下载了3.7版的源代码.
我遵循PEP 0306的指导原则:https:
//www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0306/
从Hackernoon的例子来看:https://hackernoon.com/modifying-the-python-language-in-7-minutes-b94b0a99ce14
这个想法来自装饰器语法的改进(记住,它只是一个研究的例子,我已经知道还有其他方法可以做同样的事情):
@test
def mydef (self):
pass
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
它完美地运行,遵循语法/语法文件的行:
decorated: decorators (classdef | funcdef | async_funcdef)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在的目标是将装饰器更改为接受声明,从示例开始:
@test
id: int = 1
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
分析语法,我找到了annassign,它将是:
annassign: ':' test ['=' test]
# or even use small_stmt
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
给定表示id:int = 1的标记,我将标记更改为:
decorated: decorators (classdef | funcdef | async_funcdef | annassign)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
完成(遵循PEP 0306)我去了ast.c并确定了ast_for_decorated方法,并得到了一段代码:
[...]
assert(TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef);
if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef) {
thing = ast_for_classdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_async_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
}
[...]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您可以验证是否有下一个标记(函数,类或异步)的验证,然后调用负责的方法(ast_for).所以我根据ast.c进行了更改:
[...]
assert(TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == annassign ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef);
if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == annassign) {
thing = ast_for_annassign(c, CHILD(n, 1));
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef) {
thing = ast_for_classdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_async_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
}
[...]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
请注意,我创建了ast_for_annassign方法,该方法包含ast_for_expr_stmt中存在的相同验证码,用于进行攻击:
static stmt_ty
ast_for_annassign(struct compiling *c, const node *n)
{
REQ(n, expr_stmt);
expr_ty expr1, expr2, expr3;
node *ch = CHILD(n, 0);
node *deep, *ann = CHILD(n, 1);
int simple = 1;
/* we keep track of parens to qualify (x) as expression not name */
deep = ch;
while (NCH(deep) == 1) {
deep = CHILD(deep, 0);
}
if (NCH(deep) > 0 && TYPE(CHILD(deep, 0)) == LPAR) {
simple = 0;
}
expr1 = ast_for_testlist(c, ch);
if (!expr1) {
return NULL;
}
switch (expr1->kind) {
case Name_kind:
if (forbidden_name(c, expr1->v.Name.id, n, 0)) {
return NULL;
}
expr1->v.Name.ctx = Store;
break;
case Attribute_kind:
if (forbidden_name(c, expr1->v.Attribute.attr, n, 1)) {
return NULL;
}
expr1->v.Attribute.ctx = Store;
break;
case Subscript_kind:
expr1->v.Subscript.ctx = Store;
break;
case List_kind:
ast_error(c, ch,
"only single target (not list) can be annotated");
return NULL;
case Tuple_kind:
ast_error(c, ch,
"only single target (not tuple) can be annotated");
return NULL;
default:
ast_error(c, ch,
"illegal target for annotation");
return NULL;
}
if (expr1->kind != Name_kind) {
simple = 0;
}
ch = CHILD(ann, 1);
expr2 = ast_for_expr(c, ch);
if (!expr2) {
return NULL;
}
if (NCH(ann) == 2) {
return AnnAssign(expr1, expr2, NULL, simple,
LINENO(n), n->n_col_offset, c->c_arena);
}
else {
ch = CHILD(ann, 3);
expr3 = ast_for_expr(c, ch);
if (!expr3) {
return NULL;
}
return AnnAssign(expr1, expr2, expr3, simple,
LINENO(n), n->n_col_offset, c->c_arena);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在是时候测试(configure/make -j/make install),python3.7和:
File "__init__.py", line 13
id: int = 1
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
随着语法和词法解析器的改变,编译器是否应该将令牌解释为有效,哪里出错?
id: int = 1不是一个annassign. 该: int = 1零件是一个annassign. (甚至行终止符也不算作 的一部分annassign。)Python 语法中没有专门用于带注释的赋值语句的非终结符;你可能需要写一篇。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
162 次 |
| 最近记录: |