使用查找表中的(正确)值更新/替换主数据集中的NA的最有效方法是什么?这是一个如此常见的操作!类似的问题似乎没有整洁的解决方案.
约束:1)请假设大量缺失值和更大的查找表比给出的示例.所以情况下明智的替换操作将是不切实际的(不case_when,if_else等等)
2)查找表没有主数据帧的所有值,只有替换的值.
Tidyverse解决方案的答案更受欢迎.类似的问题似乎没有整洁的解决方案.
library(tidyverse)
### Main Dataframe ###
df1 <- tibble(
state_abbrev = state.abb[1:10],
state_name = c(state.name[1:5], rep(NA, 3), state.name[9:10]),
value = sample(500:1200, 10, replace=TRUE)
)
#> # A tibble: 10 x 3
#> state_abbrev state_name value
#> <chr> <chr> <int>
#> 1 AL Alabama 551
#> 2 AK Alaska 765
#> 3 AZ Arizona 508
#> 4 AR Arkansas 756
#> 5 CA California 741
#> 6 CO <NA> 1100
#> 7 CT <NA> 719
#> 8 DE <NA> 874
#> 9 FL Florida 749
#> 10 GA Georgia 580
### Lookup Dataframe ###
lookup_df <- tibble(
state_abbrev = state.abb[6:8],
state_name = state.name[6:8]
)
#> # A tibble: 3 x 2
#> state_abbrev state_name
#> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 CO Colorado
#> 2 CT Connecticut
#> 3 DE Delaware
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
理想情况下,left_join将具有缺失值的替换选项.唉...
left_join(df1, lookup_df)
#> Joining, by = c("state_abbrev", "state_name")
#> # A tibble: 10 x 3
#> state_abbrev state_name value
#> <chr> <chr> <int>
#> 1 AL Alabama 551
#> 2 AK Alaska 765
#> 3 AZ Arizona 508
#> 4 AR Arkansas 756
#> 5 CA California 741
#> 6 CO <NA> 1100
#> 7 CT <NA> 719
#> 8 DE <NA> 874
#> 9 FL Florida 749
#> 10 GA Georgia 580
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
```
由reprex包创建于2018-07-28 (v0.2.0).
HBa*_*Bat 17
这是一个单行解决方案rows_update():
df1 %>%
rows_update(lookup_df, by = "state_abbrev")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
演示:
library(dplyr)
### Main Dataframe ###
df1 <- tibble(
state_abbrev = state.abb[1:10],
state_name = c(state.name[1:5], rep(NA, 3), state.name[9:10]),
value = sample(500:1200, 10, replace=TRUE)
)
### Lookup Dataframe ###
lookup_df <- tibble(
state_abbrev = state.abb[6:8],
state_name = state.name[6:8]
)
df1 %>%
rows_update(lookup_df, by = "state_abbrev")
#> # A tibble: 10 x 3
#> state_abbrev state_name value
#> <chr> <chr> <int>
#> 1 AL Alabama 532
#> 2 AK Alaska 640
#> 3 AZ Arizona 521
#> 4 AR Arkansas 523
#> 5 CA California 970
#> 6 CO Colorado 695
#> 7 CT Connecticut 504
#> 8 DE Delaware 1088
#> 9 FL Florida 979
#> 10 GA Georgia 1059
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
收集Alistaire和Nettle的建议并转变为可行的解决方案
df1 %>%
left_join(lookup_df, by = "state_abbrev") %>%
mutate(state_name = coalesce(state_name.x, state_name.y)) %>%
select(-state_name.x, -state_name.y)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)# A tibble: 10 x 3 state_abbrev value state_name <chr> <int> <chr> 1 AL 671 Alabama 2 AK 501 Alaska 3 AZ 1030 Arizona 4 AR 694 Arkansas 5 CA 881 California 6 CO 821 Colorado 7 CT 742 Connecticut 8 DE 665 Delaware 9 FL 948 Florida 10 GA 790 Georgia
OP表示更喜欢"tidyverse"解决方案.但是,更新联接已在data.table包中提供:
library(data.table)
setDT(df1)[setDT(lookup_df), on = "state_abbrev", state_name := i.state_name]
df1
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)state_abbrev state_name value 1: AL Alabama 1103 2: AK Alaska 1036 3: AZ Arizona 811 4: AR Arkansas 604 5: CA California 868 6: CO Colorado 1129 7: CT Connecticut 819 8: DE Delaware 1194 9: FL Florida 888 10: GA Georgia 501
library(bench)
bm <- press(
na_share = c(0.1, 0.5, 0.9),
n_row = length(state.abb) * 2 * c(1, 100, 10000),
{
n_na <- na_share * length(state.abb)
set.seed(1)
na_idx <- sample(length(state.abb), n_na)
tmp <- data.table(state_abbrev = state.abb, state_name = state.name)
lookup_df <-tmp[na_idx]
tmp[na_idx, state_name := NA]
df0 <- as_tibble(tmp[sample(length(state.abb), n_row, TRUE)])
mark(
dplyr = {
df1 <- copy(df0)
df1 <- df1 %>%
left_join(lookup_df, by = "state_abbrev") %>%
mutate(state_name = coalesce(state_name.x, state_name.y)) %>%
select(-state_name.x, -state_name.y)
df1
},
upd_join = {
df1 <- copy(df0)
setDT(df1)[setDT(lookup_df), on = "state_abbrev", state_name := i.state_name]
df1
}
)
}
)
ggplot2::autoplot(bm)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
data.tableupate join总是更快(注意日志时间刻度).
随着更新连接修改数据对象,每个基准测试运行都使用一个新副本.