Mad*_*ham 2 python loops tuples break
我想以更紧凑的形式编写循环.当我有这种形式的代码时,一切正常:
a=-1
while a <0:
user_move()
if (nastede[1]==X) and (nastede[2]==X) and (nastede[3]==X):
print("Game Over")
break
print("END")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是当我尝试使用这种形式的代码时,我的循环不会中断:
y=(nastede[1] and nastede[2] and nastede[3])
a=-1
while a <0:
user_move()
if y == X:
print("Game Over")
break
print("END")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为什么我的循环在第二种情况下不会破坏nastede[]内部y?
更改后(所有代码):
nastede=[" ", " ", " ", " ", " ", " ", " ", " ", " "]
X="X"
def list_global():
global nastede
print(" ",nastede[0],"| ",nastede[1]," | ",nastede[2]," ")
print("---------------")
print(" ",nastede[3],"| ",nastede[4]," | ",nastede[5]," ")
print("---------------")
print(" ",nastede[6],"| ",nastede[7]," | ",nastede[8]," ")
def user_move():
a=-1
while a<0:
move_hum=int(input("Write a number from 1 to 8 ?\n"))
if (nastede[move_hum] != X) and (nastede[move_hum] != O):
nastede[move_hum] = "X"
list_global()
break
else:
print("Write different number")
a=-1
while a <0:
user_move()
if all(map(lambda x: x == X, nastede)):
print("Game Over")
break
print("END")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你的条件y=(nastede[1] and nastede[2] and nastede[3])将绑定y到True,除非X是True也不会被评估为你期待.
更好的使用all结合map:
...
if all(map(lambda x: x == X, nestede))
...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这里有一个最小的例子
编辑:既然all检查这些代码会失败,因为你只从索引查询1到3,对于使用slice:
...
if all(map(lambda x: x == X, nestede[1:4]))
...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
记住python切片不是尾部包含的 [x,y)