我有一个复杂对象列表,即
class MyObject
{
public bool selected;
public int id;
public string name;
}
List<MyObject> theObjects = functionThatSelectsObjectsFromContainer();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我有一个来自另一个源的列表,它只是给我对象列表中的int id
List<int> idList = functionThatReturnsListOfIds();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在对于idList中的每个项目,我想将selected
属性设置为true.我知道我可以设置一个列表的foreach,然后在另一个列表中搜索匹配项并设置它,但我想知道是否有更快的方式.
我对下面的所有方法以及un-lucky的答案做了一些测试,其中最快的是下面的选项2,即
var results = theObjects.Join(idList, o => o.id, id => id, (o, id) => o).ToList();
results.ForEach(o => o.selected = true);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用 Linq 执行此操作的另一种方法是,我们迭代theObjects
并检查每个项以查看其 id 是否存在于idList
:
1
var result = theObjects.ForEach(o => o.selected = idList.Contains(o.id) ? true : false);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
或使用Join
and ForEach
,我们首先使用提取匹配项Join
,然后迭代这些项:
2
var results = theObjects.Join(idList, o => o.id, id => id, (o, id) => o).ToList();
results.ForEach(o => o.selected = true);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
或者,您可以Select
与ForEach
和 一起使用FirstOrDefault
。这可能会比其他两个慢:
3
theObjects
.Select(o => o.id)
.Where(i => idList.Contains(i)).ToList()
.ForEach(i =>
theObjects.FirstOrDefault(o => o.id == i).selected = true);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我对我发布的 3 种方法做了一些测试,其中我们有 10000 个MyObject
s 和 1000 个唯一 id。我运行每个方法 1000 次,然后得到ElapsedMillliseconds
每个方法的平均值。
结果是
8.288 毫秒
0.19毫秒
57.342 毫秒
one = 0;
two = 0;
three = 0;
for (var i = 0; i <1000; i++) {
RunTest();
}
oneMean = one / 1000;
twoMean = two / 1000;
threeMean = three / 1000;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在哪里
private void RunTest()
{
ResetData();
var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
theObjects.ForEach(o => o.selected = idList.Contains(o.id) ? true : false);
stopwatch.Stop();
one += stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
ResetData();
stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
var results = theObjects.Join(idList, o => o.id, id => id, (o, id) => o).ToList();
results.ForEach(o => o.selected = true);
stopwatch.Stop();
two += stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
ResetData();
stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
theObjects
.Select(o => o.id)
.Where(i => idList.Contains(i)).ToList()
.ForEach(i =>
theObjects.FirstOrDefault(o => o.id == i).selected = true);
stopwatch.Stop();
three += stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
}
private void ResetData()
{
theObjects = new List<MyObject>();
idList = new List<int>();
var rnd = new Random();
for (var i=0; i<10000; i++) {
theObjects.Add(new MyObject(){id = i});
}
for (var i=0; i<=1000; i++) {
var r = rnd.Next(0, 1000);
while (idList.Contains(r)) {
r = rnd.Next(0, 10000);
}
idList.Add(r);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我测试了un-lucky的答案(目前点赞最多),它的平均分是 147.676
foreach(var obj in theObjects.Where(o => idList.Any(i=> i == o.id)))
{
obj.selected = true;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)