我开始在linux上进行pthread编程,在第一个程序中我完全搞糊涂了.以下是我正在运行的程序
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void *print_message_function( void *ptr );
int main(){
pthread_t thread1, thread2;
char *message1 = "Thread 1";
char *message2 = "Thread 2";
int iret1, iret2;
/* Create independent threads each of which will execute function */
iret1 = pthread_create( &thread1, NULL, print_message_function, (void*) message1);
iret2 = pthread_create( &thread2, NULL, print_message_function, (void*) message2);
/* Wait till threads are complete before main continues. Unless we */
/* wait we run the risk of executing an exit which will terminate */
/* the process and all threads before the threads have completed. */
pthread_join( thread1, NULL);
printf("amit");
pthread_join( thread2, NULL);
printf("Thread 1 returns: %d\n",iret1);
printf("Thread 2 returns: %d\n",iret2);
exit(0);
}
void *print_message_function( void *ptr ){
char *message;
message = (char *) ptr;
printf("%s \n", message);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想知道的第一件事是线程执行的顺序不是顺序的?
第二件事是我内心打印("amit"); 看看main在thread1被终止期间真的停止但在输出中我们可以看到printf语句首先被执行.整个过程的输出是
线程1
线程2
amitThread 1返回:0
线程2返回:0
Sha*_*hin 12
你是对的,说线程执行的顺序不是顺序的.在某种程度上,这是使用线程的全部要点,即同时运行其他任务.
您看到的输出符合预期,可能会有所不同.
也许这会有所帮助:
main thread1 thread2
|
|--create--------+-----------\
| | |
| "Thread 1" | "Thread 2" can
| | |<- occur anywhere
| / | along this line
join(1) --------- |
| |
| |
"amit" |
| |
| |
join(2) ---------------------/
|
|
"Thread 1 returns"
"Thread 2 returns"
|
exit(0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您唯一的保证是:
Thread 1"将始终在" amit" 之前打印(因为pthread_join()在主程序可以继续之前等待线程1结束)Thread X returns ...在两个线程终止后," "语句总是会结束.