Ana*_*tol 0 haskell purescript
给出一个元素列表:
xs = [a, b, c, d, ... z]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
其中a, b, cetc是任意值的占位符.我想实现一个adjacents :: [a] -> [(a, a)]生成的函数
adjacentValues = [(a, b), (b, c), (c, d), ... (y, z)]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在Haskell中,递归定义相当简洁:
adjacents :: [a] -> [(a, a)]
adjacents (x:xs) = (x, head xs) : adjacents xs
adjacents [] = []
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Purescript有点冗长:
adjacents :: forall a. List a -> List (Tuple a a)
adjacents list = case uncons list of
Nothing -> []
Just {head: x, tail: xs} -> case head xs of
Just next -> Tuple x next : adjacents xs
Nothing -> []
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有没有一种方法可以表达adjacents没有明确的递归(使用折叠)?
免责声明:这个问题同时包含Purescript和Haskell标签,因为我想向更广泛的受众开放.我认为答案不依赖于haskells懒惰评估语义,因此在两种语言中都有效.
在Haskell中,没有显式递归,您可以使用其尾部压缩列表.
let a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0]
a `zip` tail a
=> [(1,2),(2,3),(3,4),(4,5),(5,6),(6,7),(7,8),(8,9),(9,0)]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)